Forum - View topicAnswerman - Why Are Teen Sex Comedies Only Acceptable When They're Live Action?
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mm-17
Posts: 27 |
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
Shiflan
 Posts: 418 |
|
||
|
What's interesting is that there are two entirely different perspectives at work here:
One says that art such as anime or manga (etc.) is not real, therefore there are no victims and there is no crime when talking about depictions of underage sex or nudity. The other seems to hold that if someone is looking at sexualized depictions of underage characters than that means the person doing the looking is guilty of some kind of perversion even if there is no victim. It's interesting to see how different groups of people end up with totally different views on the same subject. ...and then of course we have the crazy Western double-standards where young men are glorified for being popular with the ladies, whereas the ladies are expected to remain chaste until marriage. And the even bigger one: a movie can get away with a remarkable amount of violence before getting slapped with an R or NC17 rating whereas the slightest bit of nudity puts it full into R territory. I can't speak for everyone, but I think it's ridiculous that society seems to think that a child seeing a woman's bare breast is somehow worse than a child seeing acts of violence. |
|||
|
|||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group