×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
REVIEW: Free! - Iwatobi Swim Club Sub.DVD


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Foxaika



Joined: 28 Apr 2015
Posts: 365
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 10:56 pm Reply with quote
To be fair, he never compared the two. The question was:

Chrysotomus wrote:
Why is it that ANN reviewers get hostile and turn on their feminist goggles when they're reviewing anime which sexualize females in order to pander to males, but it's totally okay and hot to sexualize males for female convenience?


He didn't specify what kind of fanservice other than saying it sexualizes females. Unless you think all fanservice sexualizing females is bad*, then it's not as if he is specifically comparing Free! to something like Senran Kagura(or whatever is "trashier" than Free!). He later mentions Shokugeki no Soma**, noting that he thinks it more comical than actually titillating and that despite that, the double standard exists. It's just a simple question really, and not making the broad comparisons that some of the responses are.

*See Zac's post
**Admittedly I have not watched it, so I don't know personally.

enurtsol wrote:

I'll have ya know that a relative's best friend's cousin's female confidant said it's true! Makes sense; after all, what else are they gonna do in there


There's always a bit of truth to every myth, isn't there? Laughing


Last edited by Foxaika on Tue May 19, 2015 11:00 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yaki-udon



Joined: 05 May 2015
Posts: 83
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 10:57 pm Reply with quote
I'm a big fan of reverse harem anime, but for some reason I couldn't get into Free!. Maybe because most of the characters are too moe for my taste.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fencer_x



Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 278
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 12:23 am Reply with quote
Yaki-udon wrote:
I'm a big fan of reverse harem anime, but for some reason I couldn't get into Free!. Maybe because most of the characters are too moe for my taste.


That's a non-sequitur. Free! is not a harem anime; it's like saying, "I'm a big fan of jazz, but for some reason i just couldn't get into this popular death metal band."

Also moe?????????? That alone shows you never watched the show lmao. (can any of the characters even be called that? Not even Nagisa or Nitori are remotely 'moe', and half the main cast could probably appear in a bara manga).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DmonHiro





PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 6:51 am Reply with quote
No idea why people are bitching about this. The ANN reviews are pretty much consistent about fanservice.

If a show has lots of T&A:
a) and has nothing else to offer, it's treated as crap: Kanokon
b) and has a good story and characters, it gets praised: High School DxD
c) and a generic story and characters, it gets treated as nothing special. Not good, but not that bad either: Maken-ki
d) and is offensive to women, regardless of story or characters, it gets treated like crap: Hagure Yuusha.

These are just examples, and I hope I didn't get any of them wrong.
Back to top
Foxaika



Joined: 28 Apr 2015
Posts: 365
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 10:22 am Reply with quote
DmonHiro wrote:
No idea why people are bitching about this.


It's funny that one person in a sea of many is considered "people". Laughing


Last edited by Foxaika on Wed May 20, 2015 11:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrysostomus



Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 335
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 10:57 am Reply with quote
Zac wrote:
How many of the shows objectifying men are doing so in a manner that also plays into power fantasies about subjugation? How many of them rely on negative stereotypes about men in their character writing, only to then turn the man into an object of sexual desire and little else?
Tons and tons of BL manga play into this, though. Love Stage had a rape scene typical of the genre it belongs to. Not sure if ANN reviewers would have reacted consistently to that.

championferret wrote:
I am never, ever going to understand why so many guys think that the fanservice in Free! is comparable to the fanservice in the shows that tend to get panned here.

If Free! was anything like the typical 'lets see how far we can push the envelope' tripe that comes out at least once a season, you would see the following:

-Repeated nudity, and often (probably censored with beams of light)
- Crotch bulges that are painstakingly outlined as to actually depict the shape of the genitalia; also moving
-At least once an episode, Gou would accidentally land her hand or face on one of these bulges and the guys would cry out in suggestive embarassment
-extremely long scenes of the boys sucking on/eating suggestive and/or goopy food
-a scene where one of the boys trips and the goopy food gets all over him and theres a slow pan with him in a submissive pose that looks like it was pulled from a H-manga as he cries
-During the intense swimming scenes, someones swimwear would come off due to the sheer speed at which they are swimming, and they cry pathetically about it while screaming at the others not to look (the camera does so anyway)
-Every time anyone leans over or down or even moves at all, their ass would fill the entire screen.
-Literally nothing happening per episode but these things
You know why? It's because men and women have different tastes in their fanservice. Men usually like their fanservice and/or porn to be more hardcore and perverted because, well, stronger visual stuff titillates us more than love and feelings. Women prefer more emotion-based stimulation and that's why Free! nor fujoshi shows will never rival the debauchery found in otaku-pandering shows.

All of this doesn't change the fact that Free features a lot of sexualized males in an unnecessary setting conveniently constructed for the sake of pandering their bodies, and for all the feminist rhetoric thrown around by ANN reviewers I've never seen the concept of "queerbaiting" applied to fujoshi shows, even though they are very guilty of that.

The point is that for a show aimed at women, Free is heavy on the fanservice but that routinely gets ignored by the same people who criticize contemporary anime for objectifying its female characters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SailorTralfamadore



Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Posts: 499
Location: Keep Austin Weeb
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 2:23 pm Reply with quote
I did actually write something about queerbaiting for the last site I worked at (Autostraddle, a website for lesbian/bisexual/queer women). While I don't specifically address it, I think it explains why I don't consider Free! an example of that:

http://www.autostraddle.com/how-do-we-solve-a-problem-like-queerbaiting-on-tvs-not-so-subtle-gay-subtext-182718/

The whole notion of "baiting" is that there needs to be a "switch." With the shows that people spend a lot of time criticizing for this, the characters build up a lot of homoerotic tension with a same-sex character, only to be switched out with a "no homo" joke or a less-developed opposite-sex love interest. Free! doesn't have any of that (and neither does KyoAni's "yuri-baiting" in its girl-centric shows like K-ON! or, so far, this season's Sound! Euphonium). It's just subtext that isn't fulfilled, and shows do that all the time with straight characters too, so I don't personally find it offensive as an LGBT person.

Anyway, it's been explained to you why people aren't offended by Free!'s fanservice. You haven't actually disputed what people are saying about why feminists would object to one type of fanservice and not the other, just said "well that's the way it is because men and women like different things in their porn" (which is a dubious statement in the first place, and undermined by what you also say about yaoi). But even if that were so, that doesn't change the core of people's objections to it. That doesn't change why someone who cares about feminism would be alarmed by one and not the other.

I do agree with you that yaoi can be just as degrading as a lot of fanservice with women in it. But Free! isn't yaoi, since the homoeroticism is never made explicit. And it has none of its issues, because it's just a bunch of dudes prancing about half-naked. There are none of the consent issues and occasional pedophilia (in how so many ukes look underage) that you see with sexually-explicit yaoi. So you still haven't given a real reason why anyone should object to this anime specifically.


Last edited by SailorTralfamadore on Wed May 20, 2015 6:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Trypticon



Joined: 25 May 2013
Posts: 80
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 6:38 pm Reply with quote
From my perspective on fan service, if I was a female fan of Free I’d feel a little a little cheated that there is no Blu-ray release or English dub for this first season considering the kind of hype it created; Free is kind of a big deal. I know for certain that Funimation has the rights for the second season, is doing an English Dub but I’m not sure it will be released on a Blu-ray/DVD combo; I would assume they are since that’s pretty much their standard practice.

From what I've seen and heard from fans of Free, I'll take their word for it that it is a good show; I do intend to view it in its entirety at some point. Of course, it is another cog in the machine that is my monstrous anime backlog; I still haven't gotten around to Flowers of Evil yet.

Zac wrote:
How many of the shows objectifying men are doing so in a manner that also plays into power fantasies about subjugation? How many of them rely on negative stereotypes about men in their character writing, only to then turn the man into an object of sexual desire and little else?


I both agree and disagree with this in the sense that there are some pretty bad shows with heavy fan service for a male demographic, however at the same time there is a nice chunk of good ones with great character writing that contributes to good thematic/conceptual ideas and stellar overall structural composition. So while there is anywhere from a light to heavy amount of eroticism occurring that is made for a male demographic on a given series, plenty of these characters go far beyond existing just for sexual desire.

Is there much for a female demographic? No, but I’ll get to that later.

Zac wrote:
Pretending that the playing field is totally equal and that these two things are exactly alike, although one gets "picked on" unfairly more than the other, is disingenuous at best.


This is absolutely true and if I may add, I believe the reason for this comes down to the theory of probability; there is a higher frequency of shows that contain fan service for a male demographic and therefore will be a greater number of duds and stars. Basically; it feels like these shows are always being picked on, but that’s only because so many of them exist. I have seen enough great shows that have fan service that I have the utmost respect for, however; I've seen plenty of material I’m completely indifferent too; or just crap too.

Furthermore, many shows that have fan service don’t get picked on or are even called sexist because of the fan service; it’s very rare that a series is ripped apart for such a thing. Many of these shows are treated harshly for “playing it too safe” or writing issues or dull characters, or whatever else that just didn't work for that particular viewer. I have seen the rare show made for a female demographic get panned here as well, just as a reminder that there isn't some conspiracy against these particular shows made for a male demographic.

I don’t always agree with these assessments, but I’m aware they come from people with different perspectives from mine. I’m going to be straight forward about this; many of the world views of the reviewers here I don’t see eye to eye with and this is due to my experiences, how I was treated as a result of those experiences and how they are contrary points to what I hear from certain people.

When it comes to fan service for a female demographic in just about anything, it is pretty slim pickings; I’m told manga offers more because more women tend to purchase manga, however; I've only been told this; I haven’t seen anything to quantify it on any level, so it could very well be wrong.

Point being is that I bring up the idea that I have no problem with fan service for women; I have no place to; I watch enough fan service “made” for my demographic so it would be hypocritical to even entertain the notion of criticizing a series like Free when I speak highly of Maken Ki (which I don’t find problematic). So I will admit that I do tend to get pretty annoyed with people who do the inverse with Free verses some fan service show for a male demographic; context considered of course.

There is a difference however of exploring the context of a series, the integration and execution of the fan service, (perhaps even entertaining the possibility that it may contribute something thematically or cinematically to the narrative) and using all that to come to a well thought out conclusion verses ending up with a careless rationalization.

But talk is cheap, I can say I have no issue with fan service for women, I can talk about how there needs to be more; but what happens if I’m given a possible opportunity to be a part of balancing things out? Such an opportunity has come up, but nothing is finalized so I won’t go into the details now; I actually deleted my old post about it; perhaps I can talk about it some other time if the situation calls for it.

Zac wrote:
Regardless, fanservice gets called out usually if the series has one of two traits: either the show has nothing to offer BUT fanservice, and thus isn't a very good show, or the fanservice is going hand-in-hand with a bunch of really crappy regressive attitudes about women. If it's just boobs, rarely is that ever treated like a negative on its own.


I see where you’re coming from but I don’t completely agree in the sense that some people will look at a given series and claim it has nothing but fan service to offer while someone else, will get exceedingly much more out of it; I have plenty of experience with this in a handful of shows I hold in a high regard that pass fundamental narrative aspects with high marks that just so happen to contain low to high amounts of fan service in them.

Of course, that’s my opinion and my perspective; I’m fully aware others will not see it that way; and that’s fine. What it boils down to, and what I find to be a nuisance at times is how sometimes a person’s subjective opinion conveniently morphs into objective fact in a discussion about art/entertainment.

As far as poor attitudes about men and/or women, I have encountered shows and movies that I’m also not too pleased with in regards to how the male characters are portrayed and/or treated; understand that, the same aspects that would “offend me” in how a male character is portrayed also translate over to how a female character is portrayed. In other words; my constitutions are virtually identical in regards to what I would take issue with in how male and female characters are portrayed/treated.

Overall though, for me it depends upon the character writing, their motives and contribution to the story on a thematic and narrative level. As long as the characters are compelling and interesting, be it good or evil and I can understand them as characters, usually things are fine. An oversimplification yes, but the basic points I make when it comes to tropes that often come with male and female character writing. I’ve watched some of Free and I really see no problem, but at the same time, I see no issue with Queen’s Blade either (excluding the awful Vanquished Queens episodes of course), but that’s just me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
championferret



Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 765
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 7:07 pm Reply with quote
Chrysostomus: Love Stage had no rape scene. It had an attempted assault scene and every single review of that episode I have seen both on ANN and off has called that out for being distasteful. It's becoming increasingly obvious that you haven't seen any of the shows you're getting mad about.

Also, way to go on completely ignoring my list on why the fanservice in Free is nothing like the fanservice that ANN regularly criticises, and not the numerous shows every season that get rave reviews even when they do feature some extreme fanservice! Please continue to insist that Free is things that it isnt because seeing shirtless men makes you uncomfortable.

Also please continue to mansplain to the women here what they're supposed to like in entertainment because that never, ever gets old and irritating and is something I never get sick of seeing every time the topic of Free comes up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Foxaika



Joined: 28 Apr 2015
Posts: 365
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 11:03 pm Reply with quote
championferret wrote:
Also please continue to mansplain to the women here what they're supposed to like in entertainment because that never, ever gets old and irritating and is something I never get sick of seeing every time the topic of Free comes up.


This is kinda what I meant before...I mean, he never said what women are supposed to or should like.

What he did say:


Chrysotomus wrote:
You know why? It's because men and women have different tastes in their fanservice. Men usually like their fanservice and/or porn to be more hardcore and perverted because, well, stronger visual stuff titillates us more than love and feelings. Women prefer more emotion-based stimulation and that's why Free! nor fujoshi shows will never rival the debauchery found in otaku-pandering shows.


He was talking about preference, and even says "usually", implying that it's not universal. I'm not saying I agree with him or anything, but you are complaining about something he never did/said. I don't even see the implication there, and even if it were, he makes a similar statement about men, so I am not sure where the complaint is. It's like you are geared up to fight a war that hasn't even been declared yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew Powell



Joined: 18 May 2015
Posts: 4
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 4:53 am Reply with quote
I thought this was a forum based on a review of the DVD release so I don't think it was a forum for the arguments of fan service. If you don't like that Haru,Rin,Makoto,Nagisa and Rei have theirs tops off most of the time don't watch it. I like it and believe that a good anime which this is deserve a better US release
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrysostomus



Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 335
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 11:34 am Reply with quote
SailorTralfamadore wrote:
You haven't actually disputed what people are saying about why feminists would object to one type of fanservice and not the other, just said "well that's the way it is because men and women like different things in their porn" (which is a dubious statement in the first place, and undermined by what you also say about yaoi).
Just so we're clear I'm certainly not trying to preach about what men or women should like in their porn/fanservice. All I'm doing is pointing out a trend I've noticed as a fan of manga, anime and doujinshi. Doujinshi drawn by women usually have a lot emphasis on feelings and vanilla sex. The things drawn by men... well, you have Gengoroh Tagame. Well, maybe this example is too extreme.

Regarding the prevalence of rape in BL works, I suppose that indicates women are attracted to the theme of subjugation. But I still contend that the rape in these works are nowhere near as explicit (Doesn't the uke end up liking it eventually?) as the rape you will find in porn made by men for male readers.

SailorTralfamadore wrote:
But even if that were so, that doesn't change the core of people's objections to it. That doesn't change why someone who cares about feminism would be alarmed by one and not the other.
The reasons I have been given boil down to "because it's not as bad as trashier shows", as if prostituting bodies for the sake of arousal is okay as long as it's done humorously or as long as nobody is eating goopy food.

SailorTralfamadore wrote:
And it has none of its issues, because it's just a bunch of dudes prancing about half-naked.
Exactly, I feel as if it was a bunch of girls frolicking around half-naked, people who like to judge anime based on feminism would see it very differently.

championferret wrote:
Love Stage had no rape scene. It had an attempted assault scene
Come on now, it was rape and you can't deny it. Just because his big brother intervened and stopped it doesn't mean it wasn't rape.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mike.motaku



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 160
Location: Indiana
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 11:42 am Reply with quote
As a long time anime fan and buyer, I do have to wonder at how spoiled we've become. When I started collecting you got 2 episodes on VHS for $20 -$30. If you were lucky there was a dubbed version but mostly it was subtitled. Then DVD hit and people just went through the roof praising the quality of the image, the actual option of having subtitled and dubbed on the same disc and 4 whole episodes per disc?! for the same price we used to pay for those pathetic VHS tapes?! OMG!!! It was a golden age.

Now? Still the same old tired arguments re: sub v. dub, that will never change. But if there is no Blu-Ray with all the bells and whistles and pencil boards and boxes and bandannas and mouse pads and cell phone charms and art books? God help the poor bastard that puts out that piece of crap because NO ONE will buy it. Yeah. That'll show them the error of their ways and make them spend an absolute fortune putting out a product even fewer people will be able to afford to buy and even fewer who can actually tell the difference in quality.

And if we want to have a physical copy of a show we want to support? 12 episodes will cost you twice what it cost on VHS. And the costlier the set, the bigger the bragging rights. Are you kidding me? And the only way a cheaper version will be put out is if the crazy expensive one sells out quickly enough to justify it. If you're lucky.

How quickly we forget the tiny, tiny little niche we inhabit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew Powell



Joined: 18 May 2015
Posts: 4
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 11:53 am Reply with quote
mike.motaku wrote:
As a long time anime fan and buyer, I do have to wonder at how spoiled we've become. When I started collecting you got 2 episodes on VHS for $20 -$30. If you were lucky there was a dubbed version but mostly it was subtitled. Then DVD hit and people just went through the roof praising the quality of the image, the actual option of having subtitled and dubbed on the same disc and 4 whole episodes per disc?! for the same price we used to pay for those pathetic VHS tapes?! OMG!!! It was a golden age.

Now? Still the same old tired arguments re: sub v. dub, that will never change. But if there is no Blu-Ray with all the bells and whistles and pencil boards and boxes and bandannas and mouse pads and cell phone charms and art books? God help the poor bastard that puts out that piece of crap because NO ONE will buy it. Yeah. That'll show them the error of their ways and make them spend an absolute fortune putting out a product even fewer people will be able to afford to buy and even fewer who can actually tell the difference in quality.

And if we want to have a physical copy of a show we want to support? 12 episodes will cost you twice what it cost on VHS. And the costlier the set, the bigger the bragging rights. Are you kidding me? And the only way a cheaper version will be put out is if the crazy expensive one sells out quickly enough to justify it. If you're lucky.

How quickly we forget the tiny, tiny little niche we inhabit.


Yeah so thats why I bought because it was good value but I would prefer a better quality release as thats what Free! and the US fans of free deserve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JaggedAuthor



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 981
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 12:52 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
As a long time anime fan and buyer, I do have to wonder at how spoiled we've become. When I started collecting you got 2 episodes on VHS for $20 -$30. If you were lucky there was a dubbed version but mostly it was subtitled. Then DVD hit and people just went through the roof praising the quality of the image, the actual option of having subtitled and dubbed on the same disc and 4 whole episodes per disc?! for the same price we used to pay for those pathetic VHS tapes?! OMG!!! It was a golden age.


Back in the VHS days, it used to bug me that the subbed versions were often $5 to $10 more than the dubs. To a middle school kid trying to make the most of his meager allowance, that often represented a deal-breaker. Also, stores would sometimes only stock one version of certain volumes, so my Eva, Slayers, Tenchi and Utena VHS collections are mixed bags of dubs and subs. I kind of wish I had gotten into anime at least a decade after I did.

And yeah, the two-episode-per-volume thing was a pain. Pioneer, CPM and RightStuff often put three or four (sometimes five) episodes on each tape, but Viz and ADV were pretty committed to the two-episode format.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group