Forum - View topic

Answerman - Do Manga Artists Have Any Control Over "Filler" Episodes?

but that once killed Kenshin´s chance to see the last 3rd adapted.

Quote:

So when a manga artist is old/successful/powerful enough to throw their weight around a little more,

Is it just me or does it feel like there was suppose to be a bit more to this sentence?

In some ways I like the approach of anime like Attack On Titan, Yes, we had to wait 4 years in between seasons, but we didn't have to deal with any damn filler. We only have to worry about canon content. I can see why most would want the show to continue to air even with filler. If a show is off the air too long in between season there might not be enough fans left to care about it.

but then again, nto all mangaka works for shounen jump, or more broadly, not all of them work in weekly magazines, though, then again anime not based on weekly magazine manga tends not to have fillers.

If I were a manga artist, I wouldn't tolerate an unfaithful anime adaption. You either guarantee me a faithful anime, or I'm going to tell you to jump off a cliff. I wouldn't let someone destroy my work.

I think there was a filler arc in One Piece written by Oda.

In some ways I like the approach of anime like Attack On Titan, Yes, we had to wait 4 years in between seasons, but we didn't have to deal with any damn filler. We only have to worry about canon content. I can see why most would want the show to continue to air even with filler. If a show is off the air too long in between season there might not be enough fans left to care about it. It's why shows like Shirobako and Prison School might not get 2nd seasons, not because they weren't popular, but because the demand might not be there anymore. You could say that AoT is the exception to the rule.

I know the staff for the One Piece anime consults with Oda about any anime original Devil Fruits to make sure they don't accidently use one Oda had plans for later on. Aside from that, I don't think he has much involvement in the anime.

The time of the never ending shonen titles going non stop for years are ending with, One Piece and Detective Conan as one of the few survivors. Japanese TV stations have less and less time schedules for daytime shonen anime and are not investing in that kind of anime as in the past.
And with that filler episodes will also be a thing of the past. When the get near the manga they will stop until enough manga chapters are out for a new season.

As for the broader topic of filler I have never gotten the reasoning for the hate many have. There's good filler, there's bad filler, but unless it actually starts interfering with the core plot from the manga and changing it I take the approach of "I can just ignore it if it's boring". Bothering to get all pissed off and have such "rage" over something as petty as filler just seems like a complete waste of time to me. I have much larger issues to rage over. Like paying my rent or getting my scumlord landlord to finally frakking fix the roof he's been saying he would fix for 2 years now. Now THAT is worth some rage.

"In fact, some artists have tried to influence anime production over the years, and only succeeded in annoying everyone on staff."

Good. Annoy them some more.

I think filler episodes are an insult to the original creator. It's like a big middle finger to them, as though the anime staff is saying "your stuff isn't good enough on it's own, let me fix it by adding my stuff into it".

If I were a manga artist, I wouldn't tolerate an unfaithful anime adaption. You either guarantee me a faithful anime, or I'm going to tell you to jump off a cliff. I wouldn't let someone destroy my work.

Sadly, the majority of modern shonen filler is just the opposite; obviously recycled content or mindless crap that appears to be written by 10-year-olds who barely even follow the show and instead quickly skimmed the Cliff Notes to pass their tests. Filler may be a necessity, but there is no reason whatsoever for the blatant disparity in quality even without supervision from the original author.

You know, a lot of the time when they do change things in the adaptation, it's because things weren't quite right in the original, and the adaptation is a chance to fix it. There have been cases where the original had some problems and the author did what you say and said "my way or no way at all". Sometimes it winds up not happening at all and the author and companies involved don't get the money for it and the audience doesn't get the anime/movie/whatever at all, no-one wins.

Sometimes, though, it's pretty clear the author knows full well they won't get more money but considers it worth it. Alan Moore is infamous for that behavior. He hated the V for Vendetta movie and he REALLY hated the Watchmen movie, to where he refused to have his name in the latter.

In a sense, the original author might consider it a win. Maybe it's a win out of spite, or they consider it a moral victory. Everyone else still loses though.

True enough, though Alan Moore is an extreme example. And I was under the impression that he preemptively hates any adaptation of his works, and if he's not able to prevent it happening, he'll distance himself as much as possible from it - going so far as to demand he not be credited and refuse any royalties. At least that's what I heard about his approach to the Watchmen movie.

To a certain extent I can respect them sticking to their guns, but I do tend to find myself annoyed that we don't get the adaptation at all when they dig their heels in over something inconsequential or a change that would have been for the better.

Magaka meddling is the reason Japanese dub has Goku sounding like a 12 year old girl when he is a full grown man and why any anime fan I've shown the Japanese dub of Dragon Ball Z that speaks english started laughing[