Forum - View topicView on Moe.
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ggultra2764
Subscriber
Posts: 3882 Location: New York state. |
|
|||||||
Not necessarily. spoiler[Chihiro was forced to fend for herself when her parents became swine and while having some support from Haku, much of the growth in her character came from her gaining the resolve overtime to get through her situation on her own and eventually earning the respect and trust of the other bath house workers. She even found herself having to save Haku's life despite her concern for the boy's well-being.] |
||||||||
Spastic Minnow
Bargain Hunter
Exempt from Grammar Rules Posts: 4613 Location: Gainesville, FL |
|
|||||||
If moe is a feeling than there's no doubt that Chihiro can inspire it. It could be argued that if moe was a feeling than it it was Miyazaki's feelings for the girl he based Chihiro off of were moe. He knew a young cute girl and want to write an inspirational story for a girl like her. If moe is a genre or characterization it's debatable (hence the debate). She is a more realized character than moe critics have a problem with and while she is a weak girl that you want to protect and has to struggle to overcome obstacles, she doesn't ultimately need much help after a little push and her weaknesses are completely understandable for a pampered only child of 10 years and her struggle is an extraordinary triumph. That's basically why Miyazaki heroines can't be thought of as "moe characters", they are not extra weak but they have to be extra strong to overcome, not need extra help. |
||||||||
4nBlue
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Zin5ki
Posts: 6680 Location: London, UK |
|
|||||||
Whereas you previously appeared to adopt the stance that moe is a response-dependant characteristic, you now seem to be implying that in spite of the manner in which a given viewer might respond to it, a production can only be considered moe if the principle characters are somehow devoid of personal resolve. Am I thus correct if I assume that, for a production to be moe, you expect (some of) its principle characters to have both the propensity to cause a certain reaction in the viewer, and a distinct limit to their personal ability or development? I myself am happy for just the former of these conditions to be met, even in view of the implications it may have for particular highly-regarded works. |
||||||||
dgreater1
Posts: 307 Location: in the Phillipine's AIR space with Misuzu |
|
|||||||
I'm pertaining to "Moe" as a supporting word for the character (moe characters), and not the one that's associated with emotion. So in other words, I'm saying that some of these moe characters act real whether childish, maturely, retarded, weakly, etc. etc.
Is that for me? If it is then I'll clarify this. I never said anywhere that they're equal to doormats. You feel the character is moe because you just feel it, just like you said about Holo, and probably someone that's in your mind who is not a pile of weakling.
Erm... I'm not sure but, using a Japanese term "moe", over a *live*-action character wouldn't sound right. "Love", "like", "adoration", "admiration", etc. would be what I'll call a more correct term for that. Moe is more used with 2d (and 3d [computer graphics]) characters. Although, a 3d character that looks super real would be somewhat debatable. You could probably even feel moe towards a character in a purely text novel. Imagination is the key here. The people from the *live*-action show exist, while the other is contrast to that. However, if you say the guy is attracted to a "character" from a live-action show, not the actual "person" but the portrayal of the character, then that's a different situation. Although, I'm not really sure if someone actually had that kind of feeling. I mean, you admired the portrayal, yet you didn't like the actress. Well, probably having an impression like "It would have been better if X was the actress." would be similar? Anyway, as I was always pointing out "Love" is for the real (and unreal) "Moe" is for the unreal only (and you should most of the time, associate it with Japanese culture). Same feeling of affection, but one is directed to one subject and things that relate to it. Let me say this as a final note though, words are also subject to evolution, there's a chance that someday, it'd be used to almost every female, real or unreal and out of the language barrier. |
||||||||
GeminiDS85
Posts: 391 |
|
|||||||
I am very curious where this information comes from, I would greatly appreciate it if you would post or send me a link to this article. It sounds like another in a long line of correlations between two unrelated sets of data. The opposition to pornography in the United States made similar claim a few decades ago, saying pornography contributed to a decrease in birth rates. They used scare tactics such as saying men were no longer interested in women because they had found a substitute in pornography, which was completely untrue. I wonder if this correlation between the rise of moe and the decreased birth rates has any validity. I know the information about the decrease in birth rates is probably an accurate parameter of the population of Japan, but has any real statistical sampling been conducted on the otaku population regarding their rate of reproduction. |
||||||||
Reaper gI
Posts: 299 Location: UK |
|
|||||||
Moe definatly originates from lolicon in the 80's (there is a written reference in the article I quoted above), it didn't appear on 2ch until the 90's. The meaning has probably changed a lot bearing in mind it's just been used without definition for over 20 years now. We wouldn't need so much debate on it if people didn't keep bashing it without first defining what they mean by it. Also remeber it can only be applied to fictional and 2-d characters, there is a sense of being "in love" (generaly in the protective sense) with something that cannot in reality exist. Last edited by Reaper gI on Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||
Ggultra2764
Subscriber
Posts: 3882 Location: New York state. |
|
|||||||
Lacking personal resolve is a trait of the response-dependent characteristics found with moe characters as in such titles, they always need to be pushed by other characters to push along development and force a reaction from the viewers. It enforces the "helpless" part of their archetypes to create the protective feelings that fans have for said characters. Dating sim spinoff titles likeKanon and Air are quite notorious for this, especially with female characters in each of the arcs always needing the central male character's help to get them out of their situation. |
||||||||
hissatsu01
Posts: 963 Location: NYC |
|
|||||||
Sorry, I've just read things that offered that explanation, but I have no idea where at this point, though I know I've heard the same line of reasoning more than once. I'm sure it wasn't an actual study - how could you even being to control for all the variables? Like I said, while the explanation makes some sense to me, I don't really buy it. The fetishization of cute in Japanese society long precedes the current moe trend.
I think you slightly misunderstood. I've never read anything that suggested moe itself was causing the decline in birth rates. Otaku make up such a small portion of Japanese society that any such explanation is laughable (as laughable as porn causing people to abandon sex), and the decline in birth rates has been going on for a lot longer than moe. (I think it stands at 1.25 children per woman - and I'm pretty sure it's the lowest birth rate of any country). I suspect the decline has a lot more to do with Japanese women joining the workforce in far greater numbers than in the past and putting off motherhood for later in life or never, but there are probably other factors unique to Japan that have resulted in such a low birth rate. The suggestion was that the steep decline in birth rates and accompanying single children and childless adults might have caused the rise of moe. Though I suspect any study on otaku would likely find that don't exactly breed very often, I don't think it's enough to make any statistically significant difference for the country as a whole. |
||||||||
GeminiDS85
Posts: 391 |
|
|||||||
When you said, "the rise of moe was linked to the decline in birth rates", I assumed you meant that the birth rates were a result of the rise of moe. Saying the rise of moe is a result of declining birth rates is a lot different, thanks for the clarification.
|
||||||||
Reaper gI
Posts: 299 Location: UK |
|
|||||||
They're adventure games rather than sim (i.e plot works by flowchart not stats/mingames). With games like that the characters often resolve their situation by themselves without interaction with the main character. You just only see it (especially with the anime versions) in the case where they resolved it by interaction with the main character. If the story was being told from a neutral perspective rather than that of a single character the effect wouldn't be quite so bad. The anime would have to have a lot of original writing done for it, as a result. Higurashi worked ok animated as you get to see the character developed normally as well as just in their own route. Had it have been adapted like Key's stuff it would have had the comedic school life stuff followed by all of the sets of murders after another with no lighter stuff to break them up. That would feel quite a lot different than having the time resets. |
||||||||
Ggultra2764
Subscriber
Posts: 3882 Location: New York state. |
|
|||||||
Some examples then, please.
The storylines are still set up where such characters have to be made into an utterly helpless and weak girl waiting for their rescuer in the form of the adventure game's central male character to help them out of their situation, even if this creates noticeable flaws in the believability and structure of the show's plotting. Air's final arc is wrapped up in such issues spoiler[where Yukito's so-called sacrifice brings him back to life as a crow yet his actual self still exists in a recap of events from the earlier episodes. And then when Misuzu finally dies, she's brought back to life as a little girl alongside Yukito back as a young boy yet both their regular bodies are still there in the flesh for all to see.] With Kanon, spoiler[the big 180 of Yuichi and Ayu from friends to lovers within a single episode felt unnatural considering there was no buildup to that point in their relationship.] For ef: a tale of memories, spoiler[Chihiro and Renji's relationship seemed doomed in the show's second-to-last episode with Chihiro breaking off the relationship and her short-term memory loss. Where was that memory loss when they reunite and resume their relationship several days later?] Disbelief much?[/spoiler] |
||||||||
Reaper gI
Posts: 299 Location: UK |
|
|||||||
e.g. Kanon spoiler[the deamons assaulting Mai are only present if Yuichi is close to her, Ayu finds what she is looking for by herself, Makoto disseapers without going through all of the suffering etc.] Clannad (see afterstory) spoiler[ Kyou is now living for herself instead of through Ryou, why she's working as a kindergarten teacher (what she wanted to do) ]Tomoyo's problem is due to their relationship anyway . The tragedy/ forced drama that puts them in the weak position is activly caused by the main character, if inadvertantly. The Ayu route of Kanon is the dream sequences/ flashbacks. spoiler[do remember most of it is happening in Ayu's head whilst she's in the coma]It is supposed to be fairytails. The "hapily ever after" type ends do emply this. |
||||||||
rainbowcourage
Posts: 1216 Location: what is commonly known as "hell week" |
|
|||||||
I have to respectfully disagree here. Moe may have begun as a way to explain feelings or whatever, but for me it's become a characterization. Any other sense of the word is far too subjective (how are we supposed to know when these "feelings of protectiveness" are evoked?). I mean, the characterization is subjective, too, but for me far less so. Above, you almost seem to make moe synonymous with female vulnerability--which is just ridiculous. This is why I disagree whenever someone calls Horo moe. Maybe she is pandering to a male otaku audience--but in my book her character has much broader appeal because she is not moe. Streaks of vulnerability do not make a character moe; nor does idealization make a character moe, as Horo is. I mean, using that definition almost every semi-relatable female character becomes moe because how many anime females aren't idealized? To me, moe characters share certain characteristics I can't stand, doormatness being one of them--isn't that an integral part of the pandering? Isn't the female's helplessness supposed to invoke those protective feelings? That's why it's become part of the characterization. Now, the few moe characters used for horror effect are a breed apart.
Sounds like exactly the opposite. Chihiro acts how children are supposed to act--at the beginning she's bratty, not lovable and fantasized. And Jesus, not all children are automatically moe just because they can't take care of themselves. |
||||||||
driverstart
Posts: 214 Location: America |
|
|||||||
I am personally fine with Moe. I just see it as another art style anime is drawn in. I probably missed the real point to it, but whatever. My favorite is When They Cry (That is Moe in some sense right?).
|
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group