Forum - View topicThe Battle for Union Anime Dubs
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Kadmos1
Posts: 13580 Location: In Phoenix but has an 85308 ZIP |
|
|||
This can be said about many socio-political issues. Yes, many people will agree or disagree something should be changed. However, the ways to make such changes a bit more practical can be another story. |
||||
Crackler
Posts: 1 |
|
|||
Opportunity for more dubs from Ocean and Blue Water??
PLEASE |
||||
ATastySub
Past ANN Contributor
Posts: 655 |
|
|||
What if everything was peanut butter? |
||||
MarshalBanana
Posts: 5399 |
|
|||
From some interviews I've seen, the lack of Union dubs being done in California, was what killed the dub scene there in the late 00s. Bandai, and I think Geneon, did mostly union dubs. So when they went, the common VAs of the day lost work and moved over to video games and American animation.
I wonder if Crunchyroll will still have some of their dubs recorded in LA, or only use Funimation from now on. I guess given that Funimation no longer have a streaming service, it might be that everything CR gets, they dub. |
||||
Akemi Tachibana
Posts: 50 Location: Chesapeake, VA |
|
|||
That'll only lead to a massive drop in anime getting dubs, if not a total elimination of them.
|
||||
Aresef
Posts: 914 Location: MD |
|
|||
With all the truckloads of money Sony has put into Funimation and CR and other companies, it just seems miserly that they would continue to exploit Texas labor laws to avoid doing right by their actors.
|
||||
Kusakabe
Posts: 99 |
|
|||
I feel like a reason why allot of the dubbing moved over from Canada to the states was because it was so much cheaper. It would be great if this opened more opportunities for Canadian dubbing if the market is more even.
|
||||
GNPixie
Posts: 310 |
|
|||
Yep. Canada doesn't have anything like non-union or fi-core. Its union or bust; even in places like Calgary or Toronto which are budget studios vs big places like Vancouver. They'll just find a loophole. |
||||
Philmister978
Posts: 313 |
|
|||
Blue Water's the only non-union studio out there in Canada. Though most, if not every, voice actor is unionized under ACTRA, so anime dubs outside of those by Blue Water (who have loopholes despite this) are considered union dubs by default. And I don't see Crunchy, Sony or Funi sparing the expense to do that, since not only are they Union, they're more expensive due to exchange rates being what they are. (unless that's all changed, I don't follow the Canadian dubbing scene all that much) And they don't want that. And unless the Funi/Sentai actor pool decide to also rally for union status or union fees (given how many of Funi's recent dubs use union or fi-core actors from LA, New York and Canada in major roles at times), they're probably going to get more work than the Union actors will. |
||||
MFrontier
Posts: 11804 |
|
|||
Funimation already outsourced some of their dubs already, so I wouldn't be surprised if they still use LA studios for some dubs. |
||||
Greed1914
Posts: 4472 |
|
|||
And a tad ironic since the "go-to" actors for their first-party games tend to be people who came out of the anime dubbing scene, like Laura Bailey and Troy Baker. |
||||
PurpleWarrior13
Posts: 2027 |
|
|||
A lot of people seem to think Funimation/Crunchyroll and Sentai can't pay their actors union rates because they're based in a right-to-work state. That's just not true. You can have union projects in RtW states; you just can't require that all actors be union. And every state is slightly different. Here in Virginia, we're a RtW state, but union film/TV projects must cast a certain amount of union talent before they can consider non-union. They only Taft-Hartley a non-union actor if they can't fill the role with a union actor. I was Taft-Hartleyed on one project because they needed a look-alike for a principal actor, and I was already on set doing background (and my pay went way, way, way up).
|
||||
GNPixie
Posts: 310 |
|
|||
Blue Water's owned by Ocean; they're more of a budget studio though iirc and used for smaller scale projects which is why you rarely hear any of the big Ocean regulars do work there regularly, although they do swap based on the project iirc. Last edited by GNPixie on Mon Mar 28, 2022 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||
poltroon
Posts: 105 |
|
|||
Thank you for this solid and insightful article.
The cheapness of so many dubs is really shooting the studios in the financial foot, whether they understand that or not. Studio Ghibli's works got royal treatment with experienced and high quality actors and bringing those projects to a US audience with those voice tracks was extremely profitable. Bad voice acting, or rushed voice acting, just turns people off from the genre entirely. I am happy with subs, but not everyone is neurologically able to manage reading subtitles and take in the action at the needed pace to really enjoy them. Dubs are an important and valuable part of anime. But so many of them are... Just So Terrible. I wish every actor was given the time to watch the sub and really nail the lines of their character, as well as for better matches between the voices. For people not familiar with these production processes, the pay is just for the time actually on the job. It does not count audition time or prep time. And auditions... since the company doesn't pay for them, they're happy to waste the time of the participants with long lines/wait times. So for actors at this level, if you're there for the money, Costco probably pays better, until or unless you land a hit, longtime series. |
||||
scowler
Posts: 93 |
|
|||
Any examples of current anime getting non-union dubs, that would otherwise stay sub-only if union talent was required? I'm thinking of shows like 86 or Don't Toy with me Nagatoro.
|
||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group