×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
The Heroic Spirit of My Hero Academia


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pikabot



Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 168
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:49 am Reply with quote
Beatdigga wrote:
The comments nicely reaffirm why the series is terrible. People want anti-heroes. They want brains. In this day and age, people want something more akin to The Boys (minus the raging lowbrow humor) or the Punisher, not this.


...which absolutely explains why the MCU (which, whatever else you may want to say about it, definitely knows that it's telling stories about heroes) is kicking the Snyderverse's ass up and down the street at the box office? Snyder put two of the most recognized brands in comics together in one movie title, and still came away with barely more money than Guardians of the Galaxy, a movie about a bunch of Marvel D-listers with no name draw at all.

The one disconnected from the pop culture zeitgeist is you, my friend.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
residentgrigo



Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 2443
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 6:06 am Reply with quote
@Fronzel It is as good as her Power Girl or Terra comics but she is "only" the writer. The comic also fixed New52 Starfire by making her a happy go lucky nudist with connections to the 2003 Titans show, instead of that highly criticized trash in Red Hood. She CAN go grit though, if she works with a partner.
The Pro is about a superhero-prostitute and her bestselling Harley Quinn has hard-R gore + crazy sex jokes. Harley is basically Deadpool now. Why not.

Every single comic i listed is "in-continuity" and some are even faces of billion dollar companies.
The creator of the Muslim Miss Marvel got to meet Obama due to her achievements! Will Abe meet the creator of MHA? Let´s not get me riled up on how big female (and arguably LGBT) superheroes finally became in the 2010s. Hello Weekly Shounen Jump... Even Spider-ham co-starts in a book now!

And how about all the CW shows (maybe not Arrow), Power Pack from the 80s, 90% of all cartoons, and nearly all comics from the 60s and earlier. Even the "grim-dark" 90s had all sorts of "fun" books as Robin Vol.4 (185 issues long) or Young Justice. WW2-era superheroes should be the darkest of them all. (Even Robin killed people back then and he nearly managed to kill the Joker during his first appearance in 1940 by throwing him of a roof.) All War + Propaganda all the time and Wonder Woman was originally a really weird / progressive fetish porno. Criticize that limited time-span if anything. I also prefer grit over fun any day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Beatdigga



Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 4426
Location: New York
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 6:53 am Reply with quote
pikabot wrote:

...which absolutely explains why the MCU (which, whatever else you may want to say about it, definitely knows that it's telling stories about heroes) is kicking the Snyderverse's ass up and down the street at the box office? Snyder put two of the most recognized brands in comics together in one movie title, and still came away with barely more money than Guardians of the Galaxy, a movie about a bunch of Marvel D-listers with no name draw at all.

The one disconnected from the pop culture zeitgeist is you, my friend.


Except I made it a point to say those movies are terrible because they did in such a way where it was utterly oppressive. This isn't light vs. dark, it's intelligence vs stupidity. It's taking a good premise vs. teaching a bad moral.

MHA is the only story, the only one to set me off like this. I prefer Flash to Arrow by a country mile at this point, most of Marvel's films have been great, with the occasional hiccup, and I would rather see the film of Huck get off the ground than watch Preacher. It's this series, this freaking series, that does it completely wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valhern



Joined: 19 Jan 2015
Posts: 916
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 9:16 am Reply with quote
I have pretty much no idea about the Comic world, mostly because reding comics put me off like there is no tomorrow; it has to be my favorite series of EVER for me to read super-long dialogues each page (that is, Hunter x Hunter) and with more than 20 pages. That is because I'm used to the pacing of 20 pages, not 25+, even binge-reading is a slog to me, I feel like I want it to end already but keeps going on with things that most of times could be summed up in less pages. Probably the only ones I managed to really enjoy reading were the A Song of Ice and Fire adaptations of the spin-offs and the main series; and the newest Storm, which I dropped because I got busier. I want to believe I only found ones that I didn't like, but I am too occupied with mangas these days to dive into comics.

So I'm more or less the movies/cartoons kind of guy when it comes to Super Heroes, and I honestly really enjoy them like this. I don't like to think in terms of either gritty or fun, even if I particularly dislike pretentiously "mature" stories. For a Super Hero thematic, I believe that what you have to focus on two things: setting, and message. It's not that easy to choose a message, because there are plenty of ways to do it wrong, or for people to misinterpret everything, it needs very careful thought in what you're showing, and how you use your setting to show it.

Like in Hero Academia, I believe that honesty is what can drive a good story of Super Heroes. I don't mean that you can't have complex characters, narratives, or whatever, but you have to set yourself clear starts and goals, and be especially focused on how you will reach there. Also, of course that you can add more messages and new settings once you finish your work with the first one, like basically all sequels of Hero movies do, but it's even harder to carry on everything you built up on the first part to the second one smoothly, so that's another problem sometimes.

Beatdigga wrote:
Except I made it a point to say those movies are terrible because they did in such a way where it was utterly oppressive. This isn't light vs. dark, it's intelligence vs stupidity. It's taking a good premise vs. teaching a bad moral.

MHA is the only story, the only one to set me off like this. I prefer Flash to Arrow by a country mile at this point, most of Marvel's films have been great, with the occasional hiccup, and I would rather see the film of Huck get off the ground than watch Preacher. It's this series, this freaking series, that does it completely wrong.


I shouldn't say that I'm laughing; but I am.

Go ahead with your intellect and your Super Hero manual. Please, stop having your brain being unchallenged by a Super Hero story that clearly doesn't know what it's doing. Or better, go talk with Horikoshi and explain him how a Super Hero story should be done. Don't mind us, we'll just be here, clashing our dummy heads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phia_one



Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 1657
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:42 am Reply with quote
Holy crap, this article just sold me on trying MHA!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pikabot



Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 168
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:23 pm Reply with quote
Beatdigga wrote:
Except I made it a point to say those movies are terrible because they did in such a way where it was utterly oppressive. This isn't light vs. dark, it's intelligence vs stupidity. It's taking a good premise vs. teaching a bad moral.

MHA is the only story, the only one to set me off like this. I prefer Flash to Arrow by a country mile at this point, most of Marvel's films have been great, with the occasional hiccup, and I would rather see the film of Huck get off the ground than watch Preacher. It's this series, this freaking series, that does it completely wrong.


Then I think you had better give us your working definition of an 'antihero', because I don't think it's the one shared by anyone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
residentgrigo



Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 2443
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 2:23 pm Reply with quote
@Beatdigga I am one of these "stupid" people Wink . Garth Ennis is one of the best writer of all-time first of all. AMC´s Preacher and CW´s Riverdale + The Flash can co-exist just fine, or are you anti-choice?
Cinema-cut BvS (8,5/10) was further so good i nearly cried multiple times (Snyder basically adapted all my 80s/90s childhood comic dreams 1 to 1) and i expect the final-cut to be one of the best adaptations of all time. Just as his Ultimate Watchmen!
The even darker X-men Apocalypse (9,5/10) is the best film released this year, or in years, and Cap3 (7/10) was a soul-less toy commercial with a laughable script and the worst MCU villains yet. Poor Crossbones...

"Prestigious" Germany newspapers, as Die Sueddeutsche, are calling X-men Apocalypse and BvS the reason why the genre will be dead in 10 years. Urgh. Not on my watch!
WB / Fox (let´s quietly forget FF) are giving us the adaptations Disney´s film department never will (poor Iron-man...) by taking risks and Apocalypse even has a (surprisingly good) female protagonist with Mystic. Support these films with your money and word of mouth (unless you actually disagree, based on viewing these films!) or don´t be surprised if the genre will be creatively bankrupt in 10 years. Bambi 2 anyone?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 2:58 pm Reply with quote
residentgrigo wrote:
Harley is basically Deadpool now. Why not.


I guess DC forgot they already had Lobo? Maybe someone can explain why Harley Quinn became popular all of a sudden. She was made for the nineties Batman cartoon and then kind of went dormant for a few decades. She was entered into the comics but it seems like only recently she seems to have gotten attention. From what I recall the comics weren't really much like her nineties incarnation, and right now she just looks like some kind of generic punk girl.

Quote:
Every single comic i listed is "in-continuity" and some are even faces of billion dollar companies.
The creator of the Muslim Miss Marvel got to meet Obama due to her achievements! Will Abe meet the creator of MHA? Let´s not get me riled up on how big female (and arguably LGBT) superheroes finally became in the 2010s.


Not sure who or what you mean by faces of billion-dollar corporations.

Well, MHA sells roughly 20 times more than Miss Marvel does so it can't be based on popularity or sales. My guess would be a PR stunt, which is nothing new to comics. Or some kind of pat on the back for making a Muslim superhero. Neither of which speaks about the book itself so much as a hollow issue of progressiveness.

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
residentgrigo



Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 2443
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:34 pm Reply with quote
@Stuart Smith And that´s the point. Female readers never responded in droves to low key characters as Tank Girl (yeah, she sucks...) and so on but the already famous New52 Harley suddenly showed up and set the comic industry ablaze. Female fans finally got to see a women who was allowed to be as crass as such male counterparts with zero repercussions. Male fans may see her as a bad-girl waify materiel.
And i see her as a 7,5/10 comic with too many spin-offs. She is now way more relevant than in the 90s and Arrow was even forbidden from using her! That was before the show turned to shipping nonsense.
Her comic was even up for a LGBT award in 2016, so i couldn´t think of bigger cross demographic appeal.
About poor Lobo. The New52 ended up destroying him and he even got raped again (don´t even ask) BUT his film is now officially being written. Rebirth (Geoff Johns is showing brass balls in that one, as it is the official sequel to Watchmen) will probably fix his comic version, sooner or later, too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Beatdigga



Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 4426
Location: New York
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:46 pm Reply with quote
residentgrigo wrote:
@Beatdigga I am one of these "stupid" people Wink . Garth Ennis is one of the best writer of all-time first of all. AMC´s Preacher and CW´s Riverdale + The Flash can co-exist just fine, or are you anti-choice?
Cinema-cut BvS (8,5/10) was further so good i nearly cried multiple times (Snyder basically adapted all my 80s/90s childhood comic dreams 1 to 1) and i expect the final-cut to be one of the best adaptations of all time. Just as his Ultimate Watchmen!
The even darker X-men Apocalypse (9,5/10) is the best film released this year, or in years, and Cap3 (7/10) was a soul-less toy commercial with a laughable script and the worst MCU villains yet. Poor Crossbones...

"Prestigious" Germany newspapers, as Die Sueddeutsche, are calling X-men Apocalypse and BvS the reason why the genre will be dead in 10 years. Urgh. Not on my watch!
WB / Fox (let´s quietly forget FF) are giving us the adaptations Disney´s film department never will (poor Iron-man...) by taking risks and Apocalypse even has a (surprisingly good) female protagonist with Mystic. Support these films with your money and word of mouth (unless you actually disagree, based on viewing these films!) or don´t be surprised if the genre will be creatively bankrupt in 10 years. Bambi 2 anyone?


I meant stupid in the context of the story. My dislike for Ennis when he isn't writing historical fiction was not meant to imply readers were stupid. I apologize if that was worded wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
meiam



Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 3442
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 4:00 pm Reply with quote
johan.eriksson.9003 wrote:


Yeah, I read that, which is why I said you were changing the goal here. You went from talking about kids with no talent to talking about kids who just doesn't put any effort in, as if these two things were in any way similar. Besides, that example was horseshit the first time you said it so I didn't particularly feel like dignifying it, but here goes.

For someone who apparently likes to criticize this show for being too naive and optimistic, you sure seem to have a very naive idea of crime works. You said before that this hypothetical kid with a pre-existing quirk could possibly be so great with One for All that he/she could eradicate crime altogether, which is a laughable idea. No hero, no matter how powerful, can solve all of society's problems. The article already mentions this and the show takes a very clear stance on it as well. Having more power doesn't make you a better hero, because a hero's primary purpose is to inspire, to perform acts of true altruism, not to beat up bad guys. That is why All Might puts on a smile and makes a big deal about his role as "the symbol of peace". That is why Kacchan is very clearly not the better hero in this show despite being a much better fighter. All Might didn't chose Midoriya because of some sense of pity or to make himself feel good. He chose him because he showed the greatest characteristics a hero needs, which is a genuine desire to do good and help people, even at great personal cost. Results are not the only thing that matters here (or rather, beating up villains are not the only desired result), and even if they were it wouldn't matter because Izuku is far from talentless. He is also smart and dedicated enough to make good use of the power he is given, and there is no guarantee that a kid with a quirk would have that kind of skill either. If you think that someone with a handicap will always be lesser at doing something than those without a handicap, then you live in a (terrible) fantasy world.

To carry this into the real-world example, knowing that a kid has a disability tells us nothing about how smart or talented that kid really is, and it certainly doesn't tell us how far they will be able to go in society. It just means that they have a different set of circumstances that need to be taken into account for them to grow like everyone else. You keep saying that it is wasted effort to give these kids extra help because it is just going to help them be mediocre when you could be helping the gifted kids be exceptional, but that isn't how these things work. These kids aren't broken cars that need to be dragged every inch of the way just to get half as far as the already "functioning" cars. They are perfectly functional cars that happens to have a roadblock in their way. If given the right support to deal with that they are perfectly capable of driving on the same road and going just as far as everyone else.


Alright so first, I literally started talking about kid who try hard and get nowhere, here's what I said:

Quote:

But when a kid is trying his hardest to do sometime and constantly fail and shows no promise (ie kid study like crazy for science test, still get an F), especially due to some inherent physical attribute he has/lack, I think its the job of adult to help him face reality.


My position has been extremely consistent on this issue, results matters, intend do not. Everyone will always choose the surgeon with good track record and crappy attitude over the surge with good attitude but a long list dead body. Talent or hard work does not matter, results does no matter how they're achieved.

You ask for an example of how this can be applied to the show I provided one, you then moved the goalpost, has you loved saying from "example of effort being put toward kid with low potential being wasted" to deriding my example because it does not literally solve every single crime in the world (has if giving Mirdori all might power did). My example is simple, by giving all might power to an individual who can best use it you'll get far better results than this hero (without all might power) and Midori with all might power will do. You also have to remember there's literally 5.6 billions individual with quirk out there in the shows world, odds are overwhelming that you can find a hero with a power that compliment all might power AND has a great attitude. This is just like a teacher (all might) putting all his effort on the kid with the worst potential (Midori) which in turn means he can't apply his effort toward the kid with the best potential (hero with quirk that compliment all might power). If you really care about "the symbol of peace" well a hero who can just teleport (or clone himself, or fly) anywhere AND has an extremely powerful ability to save people once there will be a much stronger symbol than Midori ever will even with all might power.

Also talking about example that don't work, you car example makes no sense and change half way trough. You start talking about kid with disability and then compare them to car, you then claim that they are perfectly functioning car, literally the opposite of what "disable" means. But to continue with your car/roadblock analogy. Everyone has roadblock, from the most gifted child to the most unfortunate one, but you only have limited ability to remove them, let say you can remove 100 roadblock. You have 11 student, 1 of them has 200 roadblock on there road, while 10 of them only have 10 roadblock, which roadblock do you remove?

But to bring this all back to the beginning as this has being dragging on and getting off track, I recognize that MHA want to be about heroic spirit being the most important things and I have 0 problem with that. The problem is that the shows says that, but it does not practice what it preaches. Midori always end up using his quirk to save the day, the show action speaks for themselves, talent (quirk) trump hard work (Midori solving problem without resorting to quirk). If Midori didn't get this power, no matter how much heroic spirit he had, he would not have become a hero.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wolf10



Joined: 23 Jan 2016
Posts: 907
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 6:57 pm Reply with quote
meiam wrote:
The problem is that the shows says that, but it does not practice what it preaches. Midori always end up using his quirk to save the day, the show action speaks for themselves, talent (quirk) trump hard work (Midori solving problem without resorting to quirk). If Midori didn't get this power, no matter how much heroic spirit he had, he would not have become a hero.
He literally says that in episode 8. Midoriya does. spoiler["It's just a borrowed power that I haven't made my own yet. That's why I tried to beat you without using it. But in the end, I couldn't win and had to rely on it. I've still got a long way to go..."]

So your issue boils down to MHA pretending the underlying issue it has doesn't exist, but the show is actually aware of the issue and even has the main character bring it up himself. Do you have anything else?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leafy sea dragon



Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 7163
Location: Another Kingdom
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 9:28 pm Reply with quote
I forget when in the series they point it out, but All Might was spoiler[also born without a Quirk and inherited One for All from someone else]. And now he's the #1 ranked hero and an inspiration to millions.

I think All Might knew exactly what he was doing when he gave One for All to Midoriya.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 16941
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 11:24 pm Reply with quote
Had a report or two so lets keep it civil folks. There is a difference believe it or not between debating differing opinions civilly and calmly and simply being argumentative and insulting. Let's stick to door #1 and not door #2 shall we. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Johan Eriksson 9003



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 281
PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2016 11:35 am Reply with quote
meiam wrote:

Alright so first, I literally started talking about kid who try hard and get nowhere, here's what I said:

Quote:

But when a kid is trying his hardest to do sometime and constantly fail and shows no promise (ie kid study like crazy for science test, still get an F), especially due to some inherent physical attribute he has/lack, I think its the job of adult to help him face reality.

My position has been extremely consistent on this issue,


Yes, and then you said:
Quote:
I'm at the end of the process and I see the kid that show up late and un-prepared and later come up to me and wonder why there bare minimum work didn't get them an A+ and how come there not gonna be able to get into med school. These are kids that were never challenged in there schooling career and now that all the low achiever have been cut off they just can't keep up because they never learned simple stuff like, "come prepared" and "expect to have to work hard".


I don't really see how these two things are consitent

Quote:
results matters, intend do not. Everyone will always choose the surgeon with good track record and crappy attitude over the surge with good attitude but a long list dead body. Talent or hard work does not matter, results does no matter how they're achieved.


I know people often compare them in real-life, but Doctors are not "heroes" (in the sense that MHA sees heroes). Intent is very much a part of the job-description for a "hero" in this universe. Looking at it on a thematic level intent being more important than results is also a core message of the show itself, since that is what allows a person to change things for the better on a grand scale. The most talented doctor might be best able to help individual patients, but the doctor that does pro-bono work for the poor, researches diseases in their spare time and generally gives people hope is the kind of person who makes society as a whole better.

Quote:
You ask for an example of how this can be applied to the show I provided one, you then moved the goalpost, has you loved saying from "example of effort being put toward kid with low potential being wasted" to deriding my example because it does not literally solve every single crime in the world (has if giving Mirdori all might power did).


It's getting kind of hard to understand you here, but I never said that Midoriya could solve all crime in the world with his attitude either. However, he is far more able to impact crime on a global scale than someone whose only qualification is "results" (beating up bad guys). Being genuinely altruistic inspires change in other people, which in turn leads to less crime. Again, being a "hero" isn't about solving all the world's problems by yourself. It is about setting an example for people to follow.

Quote:
My example is simple, by giving all might power to an individual who can best use it you'll get far better results than this hero (without all might power) and Midori with all might power will do.


Again, very difficult to understand you here, but I think I get it, and you are wrong for 2 reasons.
1) As we have already discussed, beating up lots of bad guys is not the only desired result for a hero.
2) You are assuming that having a quirk automatically makes someone more capable of using One for All, which is a fallacy. You are confusing physical capability with skill/talent. More on that later.

Quote:
You also have to remember there's literally 5.6 billions individual with quirk out there in the shows world, odds are overwhelming that you can find a hero with a power that compliment all might power AND has a great attitude.


Um, no. That is not how probability works buddy. Having a larger pool to choose from makes it that much more difficult to find the one you are looking for, especially if you are on a time-limit. Izuku also proved that he had the kind of spirit that not even accomplished pro-heroes always have. Finding someone like that plus a perfectly suited quirk would be extremely difficult.

Quote:
This is just like a teacher (all might) putting all his effort on the kid with the worst potential (Midori) which in turn means he can't apply his effort toward the kid with the best potential (hero with quirk that compliment all might power).


Again, I can't really take this seriously because you keep saying that Izuku has the least amount of potential just because he is quirkless. Have you been watching the past few episodes? At all? He has repeatedly proven himself to be a smart and resourceful kid. He comes up with a strategy to accomplish his mission, he figures out a way to minimize the drawbacks of his quirk almost immediately after some feedback from Aizawa and he has extensive knowledge of both various quirks (including weaknesses) and individual people (he was able to effectively fight Bakugou without using his quirk) and he has an incredible tolerance for pain. All of these are talents of his own that are in no way diminished by being quirkless. If anything, many of his skills are a direct result of being quirkless all his life.

Quote:
If you really care about "the symbol of peace" well a hero who can just teleport (or clone himself, or fly) anywhere AND has an extremely powerful ability to save people once there will be a much stronger symbol than Midori ever will even with all might power.


False, I don't feel like repeating the same thing here again. Just go back up a few paragraphs.

Quote:
Also talking about example that don't work, you car example makes no sense and change half way trough. You start talking about kid with disability and then compare them to car, you then claim that they are perfectly functioning car, literally the opposite of what "disable" means.


Ah, semantics. Always a good fallback eh?
Yes, the word "disable" means to break or to sabotage something, but "being disabled" just means not being able to do things that most other people can in some way. They are not really related just because they sound similar.

It's almost as if the people who came up with these terms lived in a time that was even more ableist than we are now and thus decided that people who had these problems were somehow "broken" and didn't deserve consideration. Funny how that works.

Quote:
But to continue with your car/roadblock analogy. Everyone has roadblock, from the most gifted child to the most unfortunate one, but you only have limited ability to remove them, let say you can remove 100 roadblock. You have 11 student, 1 of them has 200 roadblock on there road, while 10 of them only have 10 roadblock, which roadblock do you remove?


You are absolutely correct that everyone has roadblocks in life, but you are once again using a fallacy by assuming that all roadblocks are equal and that the only difference is in how many there are. For most people these roadblocks are the equivalent of potholes and small bumps which they can overcome fine on their own. Others have huge roadblocks that require outside help to deal with. Again, isn't it funny how we as a society view disability? I live with impaired vision and my eyes barely work at all on their own, but because my problem can be handled with a pair of glasses instead of a companion dog, I am not considered "disabled" and thus doesn't face ableism from others.

And to answer your question, I would help those that need help first, like a teacher is supposed to do.

Quote:
But to bring this all back to the beginning as this has being dragging on and getting off track, I recognize that MHA want to be about heroic spirit being the most important things and I have 0 problem with that. The problem is that the shows says that, but it does not practice what it preaches. Midori always end up using his quirk to save the day, the show action speaks for themselves, talent (quirk) trump hard work (Midori solving problem without resorting to quirk).


Again, have you been watching the show at all? Did you not just see him do a hell of a lot of cool stuff without using his quirk?

Quote:
If Midori didn't get this power, no matter how much heroic spirit he had, he would not have become a hero.


True, and that is the whole goddamn point. You need outside help to deal with a disability. That is why we have glasses, hearing-aids, wheelchairs and prosthetics. Using these things doesn't make you less of a person or any less talented or capable. The point of the show was never that you only need spirit to succeed in life. It is very important sure, especially in order to change the world as a hero, but the show is also about disability and how people sometimes need trust and support from others in order to reach their full potential. All Might giving Izuku his power is that support. He could never have become a hero without it sure, but if he didn't also have that incredible spirit and his own talent, it wouldn't have mattered how much power All Might gave him. Getting One for All was just the support he needed to enter the same playing field as everyone else, but it is not the only reason he is succeeding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group