Forum - View topic

INTEREST: Japanese Art Commission Platform Skeb Bans AI Art

AI art is not a tool for artists, its a tool for the elon musks, the jeff bezos and the people who want to bypass the process of paying an artist, and ultimately replace artists. It will not only replace illustration, but it can replace pixel art, abstract, photography, graphic design, stock art, motion graphics, 3d modelling, screenwriting, novel writing, poetry, lyric writing, music composition, game design, animation, video, voice acting and more. There's nothing stopping AI from copying any art you create to be challenging, under the illusion your challenging conceptual art can't be replicated by a computer. If you decide to make "AI-enhanced" video games, say a VR world with AI dialogue, the AI will in 10,20,30 years be able to automate the whole process of making that VR world, every single creative genre can be automated. The only reason, if in twenty years AI hasn't replaced all these artistic endeavers will be if artists and storytellers collectively reject the concept the AI art is a tool, the public recognises AI media needs to be stopped, and people collectively work to destroy AI media including art in its entirety.

By the way, before using those kinds of techniques for creating backgrounds (I'm not sure why that would be more ok than character portraits?), you should also be aware that currently, AI-generated images are not protected under copyright law. Anybody who wants to can use any image you generate from a neural network for anything they want, which is another reason why this stuff is poison for any real professionals.

You're making way too big a deal out of this. AI is just a fun tool that can help in certain areas. Most photoshop programs already use it for thinks like auto-correction, line smoothening, auto-crop, chroma-keying, and other stuff us artists use all the time. Let alone video games where all of them have AI in them since the dawn of time for adaptive gameplay..
I've seen some cool AI art pieces. Nothing wrong with it as itself. If it lets more people create and enjoy works then all the better.

AI is just a fun tool that can help in certain areas. Most photoshop programs already use it for thinks like auto-correction, line smoothening, auto-crop, chroma-keying, and other stuff us artists use all the time. Let alone video games where all of them have AI in them since the dawn of time for adaptive gameplay..

I've seen AI art, and most of it is at "10 years of devoted practice" level of drawing ability. People shouldn't have the ability to be able to type in words and spit out something which would take devoted practice for ten years.

This isn't quirky technology. It's dystopian.

Every awful technology can be defended as the march of progress, but human cloning isn't allowed.

Why should AI art be allowed? It shouldn't. It's exploitive and will end human desire to create if normalised.

People being okay using AI technology to generate line smoothening algorithms or difficulty adaption algorithms does not mean people should be okay to use AI technology to "type in video game idea and click enter to create a whole video game", but this will be possible using AI.

It's like saying if you're okay with gay marriage you should be okay with dakimakura marriange. It's ridiculous..

If, for some reason, you want to pay someone to type in prompts for you, there are other sites where those services are available