Forum - View topicNEWS: New York Times on TV Anime
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mayko
Posts: 11 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
I know you can find it online, but can you find it in Sunday's paper? Because I have that paper because they sent the wrong newspaper to our house... so if someone could tell me what page it's on if it is in the paper, I'd be grateful!!
|
||||||||||||||||||||
jdb728
Posts: 77 Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Just to note a little mistake. Naruto has, and is being aired on Cartoon Network, but it is not, and never has aired on Adult Swim. Just thought I'd point that out. Thanks. |
||||||||||||||||||||
space clam
Posts: 636 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
What the hax the link now wants a login. Anyway, I think I meant to write "samurai-in-training;" whether I did or not, the point still stands.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
lion-san
Posts: 40 Location: Austin TX |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
yes very good article indeed
no bashing at all good job there nytimes im surpised they didn't say anything about the best americanize anime style cartoon out there Avatar |
||||||||||||||||||||
Animedude35
Posts: 98 Location: Dallas, Texas |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Anyone have the link to the whole article without having to log in? I don't mind these things, but I just don't want to sign up for something I would probably only see once
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Tondog38
Posts: 89 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Animedude: www.bugmenot.com
This is by far the worst article I've seen in my entire life.
Oh and those chibi deals aren't used to supplement the story at all, ever. They are there merely for cuteness factor and humor, just like in American cartoons.
Just because something portrays anime in a positive light does not mean that it is a good article. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tommimacevovi
Posts: 21 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Like you said, everyone has his opinion, but you have to admit, for once they actually put relatively most of information correctly and protray it in a semi-neutral manner. BTW: have you actually watch some of the show AND think of the meaning that they have, one thing about Japanese anime is about the messages BEHIND the action. If you just watch the show and then dismiss it as childish is pretty much meant you have not truly watched the show at all, or at least not truly understand the meaning of the show. For example: FMA's true messages behind the action is simple: sometimes well-intentioned action (Ed getting Al back to normal) could have consequences far beyond one's imaginationspoiler[Philospher's stone must be created with souls of people killed by someone], and one must take responsibility for such action and wonder what is truly right and what is truly wrongspoiler[use the stone and condemn your soul to the sin of murder or not use the stone and condemn your brother to a life of hollowed existance] That just my two cent. At least try to read an article without immidate opinion based. Don't forget, the writer probably have never watch anime until those shows came on CN, so to him, FMA, Naruto, and Samuari Chaploo might be news to him. |
||||||||||||||||||||
xSUiT
Posts: 20 Location: The inner depths of a shell |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Anath_19
Posts: 87 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
I do believe that he's saying that because cartoons in Japan aren't focused entirely on children, it allows them to have, say, plot. And character development. Which means higher quality than most American cartoons that have neither of those.
I can't say anything about bobobo, because that does appear to be "heavy on forced laughs" (haven't seen it myself), but where are the laughs in Naruto? From what I've seen, they're all in the first 2 or 3 episodes, and maybe a couple random episodes later in the series. Though it doesn't exactly have a heavy story, it does have character development, which is pretty much one of the only things going for it.
Have you even really seen Naruto? There are maybe a handful of scenes with Naruto "getting in trouble doing things" and a large amount of scenes with him, well, being serious. And not getting in trouble. If the whole anime were just Naruto doing one crazy stunt after another that made people angry at him, you'd have a point. But it's not. |
||||||||||||||||||||
TheHTRO
Posts: 328 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
"If you just watch the show and then dismiss it as childish is pretty much meant you have not truly watched the show at all, or at least not truly understand the meaning of the show."
And yet when certain..."people" (I'm not a name dropper) come across shows like the aforementioned Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo, they dismiss it, and/or criticize it simply based on the grounds that the show "doesn't make sense". To put it in perspective, Bo-bobo could be seen by some as "childish", but that's because that's how it's supposed to be. Anyhow, the NY Times article (which requires free registration) was described by Toon Zone as "condescending". |
||||||||||||||||||||
DriftRoot
Posts: 222 Location: NH |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
I'd tend to agree. While I'm happy that there wasn't flagrant ignorance, prejudice or generalizations being made about anime in the NYT article, it left me with a niggling suspicion that the author was coming AT the subject of anime from smack in the middle of the camp that Japanese animation is all about creepy sex, Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh and DBZ and the occasional Miyazaki-quality film. He's not on "our" side attempting to make others see anime in a different light, he's on "their" side, attempting to make others see anime in a different light. This puts a damper on the forcefullness of his assertions, which obviously haven't even driven HIM to rethink things and take a new stance. One doesn't get the feeling the author is knowledgeable about anime above and beyond the creepy sex., "Pokemon," Miyazaki etc. How about mentioning who the creator of "Samurai Champloo" is and how his earlier series, "Cowboy Bebop", was a HUGE "gateway" show for fans in North America? I doubt he knows, so he doesn't do this. He's just skimming the surface of Adult Swim (pun intended), plugging the "Japanese cartoons = shows for the kid-focused Cartoon Network" angle. How about explaining WHY Adult Swim showed up in the first place? - because anime deemed innappropriate for kids are a hot commodity, and CN is one of the only places the general public can find them without shelling out money for DVDS or pay-per-view services. Really. The author complains about how late these shows are aired as if he wants them on earlier so CN's major audience doesn't keel over from lack of sleep. It's NOT the elementary school kids watching Samurai Champloo, it's older teens and adults! How about mentioning that OTHER companies have seen the potential market for adult anime and jumped on board, offering the kinds of shows CN wouldn't air during prime time (without censorship, at least)? On this note, how about pointing out that some of the shows CN airs are censored/edited to make them more appropriate for young, American, kids whose parents would probably complain if they saw Saitoh smoking a cigarette? Horrors! How about associating adult anime with something OTHER THAN HENTAI?? Granted, the perception of most Americans about cartoons - that they're entertainment for kids - automatically causes any anime appropriate for kids to be labeled as for kids. It's not something that's going to change anytime soon. But this article doesn't do much to shed light on this flawed way of thinking, because it's pretty obvious that the author shares the same opinion. Ok, so he mentioned "The Simpsons" and a few other primetime, animated series popular with adults as proof that cartoons aren't just for kids; he mentioned the award-winning "Spirited Away;" he tossed out a few tidbits regarding upcoming series with more depth like "Paranoia Agent" and "FLCL." But he's still laboring under the common impression that, since American cartoons can be as easily divided into "adult" and "kid" categories, so too can their Japanese counterparts and this is how audiences should see them. Elements of strong plot, characters with depth, attractive animation, mature themes and quality soundtracks often infuse anime that is not for adults only. Look at FMA! He doesn't refer to it as anything other than a show for tweens that happens to air late at night. p.s. The pampering American children receive with regards to "safe" content in dumbed-down shows goes a long way towards explaining how difficult it is for most adults to grasp the idea that "sensitive" subjects like divorce, death, poverty, serious (not comic) violence, social injustice, war etc. is for adults-only, causing them to overlook or remain ignorant of the fact that many anime series regularly explore such themes, regardless of the viewer's age. I'd love to know if "Kodomo no Omocha" would wind up on Adult Swim if CN aired it. pps. I'm one of those children who grew up in the 1980's barred from watching anything heavier than "The Smurfs," and my mother even had some issues with that show (still does, she doesn't like all the violence and whatnot in cartoons). God help me if I snuck a peek at "He-Man" while at a friend's house! This is one reason I'm so attracted to anime, because it's a storytelling medium I enjoy in a flagrant reversal of roles from when I was a kid - I couldn't watch most cartoons then because, according to mother, they weren't appropriate for children; now I'm not supposed to watch cartoons because they ARE appropriate for children. Talk about a double standard! to you, Mom! The same kind of line divides the thinking of most adults, however, that certain cartoons are for kids and certain cartoons are for adults based exclusively on the maturity of their content, and that kids shouldn't be exposed to heavy issues on TV. This kind of thinking doesn't work at all with anime. For the record, I think it's appalling that parents let kids under the age of 13 watch South Park. I remember when "The Simpsons" was horrifying American audiences, however, so I guess eventually something even WORSE than "South Park" will come along and become acceptable entertainment for children. *sigh* Anyways, look how big this post got! |
||||||||||||||||||||
PeaceMaker1
Posts: 40 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
I agree with the article. I mean, this is the reason people say anime is just plain better than American cartoons. American cartoons are too elementary and don't deal with a lot of the things that are shown in anime. I'm not playing the "ANIME IS TEH MATURE CARD" here because I know most anime is geared towards the 13-17 demographic. But you have to admit.. today's American cartoons are just too simple and the jokes are too forced. Avitar: The Last Airbender is a right step in what American cartoons should be (though I believe Koreans helped in the making of that, not sure.) It's not episodic like most American cartoons and features a great cast of characters, some great fights, and has some slick animation going for it.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Tenchi
Posts: 4471 Location: Ottawa... now I'm an ex-Anglo Montrealer. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Yeah, I'd sooner watch any random episode of The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy over any random episode of Fullmetal Alchemist any night of the week. (Well, I mean, I would if I had the choice, which I don't because FMA doesn't air in Canada, though I've seen it in a club setting so I'm not talking out of my butt here.) I don't find anything about the comedy in Billy and Mandy "forced". |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dark Chi
Posts: 34 Location: Hades |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
I just read the Sunday NYT's article and found it confusing. Was the article about Cartoon Network or anime on American TV in general? It seemed to me that the writer failed on the latter since he doesn't mention anime on other nets such as G4, The Anime Network (VOD), Anime Selects (VOD), Starz and Showtime Extreme.
I'm sorry, but mentioning FLCL and Paranoia Agent is like saying that the Longhorns had just won the Rose Bowl -- last week. Dated sources and dated information. A poor article. And what was the deal with describing Samurai Champloo with Crazy/Beautiful? That was condescending! The article more or less was a pr machine for Cartoon Network, not for anime. They just happen to air anime on the net. Dear Editors of The New York Times - get qualified writers who know what they are writing about before printing it! Mike Hale, are you Jason Blair? |
||||||||||||||||||||
ashram12
Posts: 86 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[quote="daxomni"]
It's true that anime series [b][u]could[/b][/u] use their time to flesh out all the important details that sometimes get overlooked in the movie productions, but my experience is that many anime series simply squander the extra time afforded to them and just seem to wander from one episode to another before suddenly trying to tie up all the lose ends in the last couple episodes. In other words the extra time allotted to a series is often wasted, at least in part, instead of being planned with care to provide a significantly more satisfying experience. I've seen GitS and Akira, and it's true that it's sometimes hard to keep up with them, but the NGE and Utena [b]series[/b] were even more confusing to me. Millennium Actress was groundbreaking for me and Vampire Hunter D is a true classic IMO. Spirited Away is quite possibly my most prized possession among all the anime I have ever seen or ever will see. If Spirited Away was already "too long" in movie form, then how could it have possibly been improved by making into an even longer series?[/quote] Whereas you feel that anime series tend to waste their time by not developing story or characters, I've seldom felt that way. Except for Inuyasha... Actually one of the things that I like about anime series is that each episode is 30 minutes long. So, even though a Spirited Away tv series would technically be longer than the movie, the fact that you watch in 30 minute increments make it seem less long. And also, I don't mind being a bit confused for 30 minute increments than being confused for two hours. I know it's a completely lame explanation, but that's my perception of things. |
||||||||||||||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group