Forum - View topic
Anime & Manga = Propaganda?


Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Anime News Network Forum Index -> General -> Anime
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
musashi1600



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 199
Location: Hawaii
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:17 am Reply with quote
Way to fearmonger, CNN.

Then again, I've only seen the first episode of Zipang so far, so who knows? Wink Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
fighterholic



Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Posts: 9193
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:14 am Reply with quote
Complete bull. Nobody wants a war more than Japan does, and the Defense Ministry can't go on the offensive anyways. Doesn't mean that they can't deploy, that should be obvious when they sent troops to Iraq. Only if Japan were to amend it's constitution could it go on the offensive, but I doubt people want to fight anyways in Japan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Abarenbo Shogun



Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 1573
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:18 am Reply with quote
musashi1600 wrote:
Way to fearmonger, CNN.

Then again, I've only seen the first episode of Zipang so far, so who knows? Wink Twisted Evil


Anderson Cooper prefers....SEAMAN SHIP!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJrIF7pHyO0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maryohki



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 526
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:13 am Reply with quote
I just love how they seem to have the attitude that Japan is exactly the same as it was during WWII.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Kouji



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 978
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:48 am Reply with quote
Maryohki wrote:
I just love how they seem to have the attitude that Japan is exactly the same as it was during WWII.
What I love is how they call Japan immature because "ZOMG, cartoons are for kids!" Rolling Eyes Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the U.S. use Bugs Bunny in military propaganda cartoons, too?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger My Anime My Manga
Maryohki



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 526
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:03 am Reply with quote
Kouji wrote:
Maryohki wrote:
I just love how they seem to have the attitude that Japan is exactly the same as it was during WWII.
What I love is how they call Japan immature because "ZOMG, cartoons are for kids!" Rolling Eyes Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the U.S. use Bugs Bunny in military propaganda cartoons, too?


Yes, that was nice of them too. D=.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
SalarymanJoe



Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 468
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:18 am Reply with quote
abunai wrote:
Yes, I tend to agree, that's a pretty damn stupid and bigotry-laced article.

Shame, really, because the use of mascot characters is an interesting trait of Japanese official culture, and might have made for an interesting topic, had it not been used as a vehicle for this biased claptrap, instead.

Then again... it's CNN. Their motto could be "Less biased than Fox. Just barely."

- abunai


It's actually an Associated Press article that CNN is circulating.

My comment can be summed up into one word: "So?" While not so much in the Middle East, the image of a 'Japanese military' makes a lot of people uneasy still, despite the drastic change in Japanese society since the war, including but not limited to Article 9.

I don't think the issue of recurring former military images is unique to Japan, either. I know that in the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia, East German troops were not a part of the initial invasion, but then played a smaller support role after the invasion occurred. The reason for this was that many Czech citizens would respond more negatively to an invader speaking German than ones who were speaking Russian, Polish, and other eastern European languages. I wonder how German ground troops/peace-keepers were received in the former Yugoslavia in the late 1990s? Despite Germany's about face, even militarily from the 1930s and 1940s, I think there may still be a stigma attached to them.

If painting Captain Tsubasa on their trucks or drawing cute cartoons showing Japanese-Arab friendship helped them accomplish their mission, then by all means, use it.


Last edited by SalarymanJoe on Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
hentai4me



Joined: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 1313
Location: England. Robin is so Cute!
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:35 am Reply with quote
What I got from that is that Japan wants to use Anime characters to make diplomatic relations easier, using culture as a diplomatic weapon as opposed to economic or military sanctioning, and powermongering.

If indeed using Captain 'Majed/Tsubasa/etc' kept Japanese vehicles safe or at least played some role in it then how can you complain?

'Oh no, the Japanese didn't get shot because they have cartoons on their trucks...I call foul play!'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
abunai
Old Regular


Joined: 05 Mar 2004
Posts: 5463
Location: 露命
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:39 am Reply with quote
Yes, I tend to agree, that's a pretty damn stupid and bigotry-laced article.

Shame, really, because the use of mascot characters is an interesting trait of Japanese official culture, and might have made for an interesting topic, had it not been used as a vehicle for this biased claptrap, instead.

Then again... it's CNN. Their motto could be "Less biased than Fox. Just barely."

- abunai
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Patachu
Past ANN Contributor


Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 1325
Location: San Diego
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:53 am Reply with quote
I find the style of this "Prince Pickles" mascot unsatisfactory, looks too Americanese.

Isn't there like an SDF-tan?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rakushun



Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 116
Location: Hawaii
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:59 am Reply with quote
"Some contemporary artists have used their characters to tout a more resurgent Japan, like the popular Yoshinori Kobayashi, who has sold millions of copies of cartoon books -- or manga -- that claim Japan's fight in World War II was a noble battle to liberate Asia from a racist world order."

I'm not entirely opposed to Japan building its own military, since it means the US can finally get out of their backyard after 60+ years. What worries me are the revisionists like Yoshinori Kobayashi who downplay or flat out deny Japan's war crimes of 60+ years ago.

And why is it "Prince" Pickles and not "Mister" Pickles? Is this typical of anime mascots, or am I missing something in translation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
pat_payne



Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 179
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:41 pm Reply with quote
Associated Press wrote:
Artists were coerced to write cartoons that subtly spread militarist propaganda during World War II. One series centered on a family cheering soldiers off to war and sharing provisions with neighbors. Other artists depicted Allied leaders as cowards or repulsive devils.


So? All the major combatants in the war used the film medium as part of the war effort. In the US, as another poster mentioned, the talents of Disney and Warner Bros. were harnessed to make propaganda shorts. And some of them could be almost as raw as their Japanese counterparts.

Take "Bugs Bunny N*ps the N*ps," for instance. The cartoon was typical of the treatment of Japanese in the wartime period (as I mentioned elsewhere in the forums, the perception changed almost overnight with the surrender) -- Bugs gets the best of short, buck-toothed, thick-glassed stereotypes who seem to make every other word "please" or "sorry" or "honorable." I love watching the old wartime cartoons for a historical perspective...but this one is so over the top racist that I cringe when I even just hear the title.

Or "Tokio Jokio", by Norm McCabe. The same exact stereotypes reproduced for the US forces. The idea was (as all propaganda in all nations is) to dehumanize the enemy, to break the troops' fear of them, to make it easier to fight them. Laugh at 'em or make them less than human and soon they're not as fearsome.

We had the "families cheeering their sons off to war and sharing resources" cartoons as well. Mickey Mouse and Pluto starred in cartoons urging that Americans save old cooking grease for munitions plants. Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd were featured in a short advertising War Bonds. Donald Duck was in a cartoon that advocated paying one's income taxes to fund the war effort.

Even in non-war-related cartoons, the war entered -- In one Bugs Bunny cartoon (in which he became a "Superman"-style hero), Bugs foils the villain at the end by ducking into a phone booth and...emerging as a US Marine, marching off to battle. The villain may have been dastardly and low, but even HE wouldn't interfere with an Allied victory.

The Soviets made animated propaganda by the bushel, believing film to be their key form of propaganda for an illiterate population. Granted, most of it was directed at the Germans as the USSR didn't officially declare war against Japan until just after the bombing of Hiroshima.

To say (or in this case imply by omission) that the use of animation was a uniquely Japanese form of propaganda is something of a lie.

Associated Press wrote:
like the popular Yoshinori Kobayashi, who has sold millions of copies of cartoon books -- or manga -- that claim Japan's fight in World War II was a noble battle to liberate Asia from a racist world order.


Bullshit. Our own forces were by no means saints (Order 9066 ring a bell?), but to say that the Imperial Japanese Military was on a noble mission to end racism in Asia is pissing on the world's leg and saying it's raining.

The Japanese were out to build what they called "the Great East-Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere," an exclusively Japanese economic zone, where the Empire could harness the resources and labor of Asia for the benefit of Japan, which as an archipelago hugging the coast of Asia was (and to a lesser extent, still is) somewhat economically hamstrung by lack of natively-residing critical resources such as fuel oil and coal, to name just one. It's no coincidence, therefore that they went after the oil and rubber resources of Java/Indonesia and the mineral resources of China/Manchukuo -- or that that the attack on Pearl Harbor was a response, essentially to the US-led embargo on aluminum, fuel and other war resources in response to Japanese actions in China.

Was there racism in Asia? Tremendously. The colonizers did take a Kiplingesque, "white-man's burden" view of their new dominions, seeing the natives as little more than "savages" to be exploited or civilized. To them, the life of an Indonesian, or Chinese, or Burmese, or Indian was cheap. However, where was the Kwangtung Army's concern for the racism of the foreign concessions in China when they set up the "special units" and tested biowarfare agents on the Chinese population?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abunai
Old Regular


Joined: 05 Mar 2004
Posts: 5463
Location: 露命
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:23 pm Reply with quote
pat_payne wrote:
The Japanese were out to build what they called "the Great East-Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere," an exclusively Japanese economic zone, where the Empire could harness the resources and labor of Asia for the benefit of Japan, which as an archipelago hugging the coast of Asia was (and to a lesser extent, still is) somewhat economically hamstrung by lack of natively-residing critical resources such as fuel oil and coal, to name just one.

Or, viewed a different way, Japan was out to create its own Asian version of the United States' Monroe Doctrine. Imperialism it was, but hardly without precedent.

- abunai
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
kyonichi



Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 16
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm Reply with quote
At least Japan uses propaganda. The American government has made it pretty clear that they don't care enough about what we think to even bother brainwashing us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DragonsRevenge



Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 1150
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:29 pm Reply with quote
Abarenbo Shogun wrote:
musashi1600 wrote:
Way to fearmonger, CNN.

Then again, I've only seen the first episode of Zipang so far, so who knows? Wink Twisted Evil


Anderson Cooper prefers....SEAMAN



Hehehe

/sophomoric humor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> General -> Anime All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group