Forum - View topic
Chicks On Anime - Fansubs (Pt 2)


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 15233
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:06 am Reply with quote
dragoneyes001 wrote:

the other thing shooting companies in the foot is cost per DVD when they expect the average purchaser to shell out 50-70$ for 45-90 minutes of anime they can pretty much expect sales to suck on those particular DVD's. the DVD right next to these which offers 120 minutes of anime and is priced around 25-30$ will see better sales even though the series is actually less popular.


The $ is used in many countries, so I'm not sure where you are, but in America, US$20-30 per 120 min has been the standard for years now. It'll go down even lower as boxset releases (usually 325 min) for US$40-50 become more prevalent.

Even in the days of sub VHS, it was never as bad as averaging US$50-70 for 45-90 min. On average, as bad as it got was US$40 for 60 min.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

the other big issue with DVD's is a large percentage of the series being dub'd are altered from the original stories (4Kids adaptation of one piece as an extreme example) where they simply suck afterward in comparison to the fansubs made directly from the raw episodes. reduces sales.


4Kids and DVDs don't even mesh since 4Kids hardly releases anime DVDs, as their foci are on TV ads and merchandise licensing. And the few times they do release DVDs, it's usually super cheap because it's dub only, sold at Wal-Mart et al., and thus sell a lot to their kids audience (actually, the kids' parents).

OTOH, DVDs actually released by anime companies, generally the dubs are not too much altered and also include the original Japanese with subs for those who don't like the dub.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

there are lots of factors killing DVD sales its not just that fansubs exist. the companies who sell anime are responsible for a lot of lost sales themselves.


Yeah, just generally not the ones you mentioned.


Unit 03.5-ish wrote:

Oh, and those "ugly yellow subtitles"? Uh, that's been that way for a long time, and do you know WHY yellow outlined in black in Arial is the most common font?

Because for one, Arial is a very easy font to read (no serifs or fancy trappings). And yellow has been scientifically proven to be the color that most immediately attracts the eye, hence why it keeps your attention on the subtitles. It's not about the companies trying to deprive you of fancy text; it's about SCIENCE! (TM)


Well, dunno about science, but the yellow subs date back to the sub VHS days. The companies and fans settled on a compromise that's acceptable to both sides. White subs on white or bright backgrounds don't look readable, and since that scenario occurs more often than yellow on yellow, that's how they settled. Aesthetics was not the primary priority. So those who complain about yellow, t'was your fellow fans who outvoted you. Laughing


iindigo wrote:

I'm not asking for anything super-fancy - I just want something that doesn't clash with the anime so badly. Also, would it really be too much to ask for some antialiasing on that sub text?

EDIT: Here's a screenshot of what I think looks good for subs. It's simple, easily readable, but doesn't smack you in the face and clash like hell:

http://iindigo3d.com/screenshots/subex2.png


That doesn't look white but rather off-white on my screen. Not sure if DVD's limited color palette could even use that.

Anyways, the sub color is kinda supposed to clash, instead of blending in, for greater readability. As mentioned, aesthetics was not the priority. Soft-subs also improved upon the hard-sub VHS days.


configspace wrote:

The biggest problem I have with DVD vobsubs is not the style used itself (I don't mind the simple yellow subs) -- it's the lack of positioning, and also the lack of multiple fonts/colors that's critical when you are displaying subtitles for multiple things at once on screen (simultaneous lines and signs). The R1 subs can become an utter mess in this regards.


It's not just R1; that's a limitation of the DVD spec. In order to get the DVD specs out ASAP, the content makers and DVD manufacturers compromised on many specs, and so the subtitle spec became an afterthought. IIRC, it was limited to 4 parts: usually the sub color, the border, anti-aliasing, and the invisible color background. So if you want to keep the last 3, at a time, you can only have 1 sub color for multiple speakers.

Font can be different though, and many times, the 2nd speaker's sub is italicized to differentiate. This shouldn't be an issue anymore with Blu-Ray.


Greed1914 wrote:
configspace wrote:
Zalis116 wrote:
And in regards to "being charged extra" for the English dubs...I don't see fans of Star Wars or the Simpsons complaining about additional French, Spanish, Portuguese, etc. audio tracks on those DVDs, so why is this such a particular complaint to anime fans?

Because R1 anime is already more expensive than domestic shows and dubbing can add a significant amount to the retail price depending on how much they think they can sell. The point would be moot only when the price of anime comes down to the price of the Simpsons.


The trick isn't so much the dubs adding to the price as it is that widely broadcast shows, like the Simpsons, receive healthy funding from the networks that air them and advertisers and not needing to use DVD sales for primary funding.


It's not just that but also distribution. Big media companies like 20th C Fox have their own distribution channels worldwide, so they can distribute that same Simpsons DVD on multiple markets with minimal changes. So for efficiency, they need only make 1 master disc; 1 disc global, 1 disc to rule them all.

Worldwide anime licensing doesn't work that way. At least not yet.

Besides, similar tricked-up anime would never sell in the magnitude of The Simpsons to be in the same price anyways.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

they have barely released 50 episodes that puts them nearly 3 years behind the series sorry don't feel like dieing of old age before they decide to get to next weeks episode.


But of course you still bought those Funi 50 eps since you fully support One Piece done right, right? Very Happy


dragoneyes001 wrote:

it took fansub fans totally bashing the 4kids series all over the internet before funimation decided to.


Oh please, 4Kids couldn't care less about fansub fans - or even just anime fans. 4Kids dropped One Piece because they couldn't sell merchandise licenses of it for children's products. FUNi just picked it up afterwards. Let's see how many fans actually support the DVDs like they say they would. Razz


dragoneyes001 wrote:

ADV and AnimEigo for sure have repackaged some series in ways they become deceptive. there are others as well and your probably mistaking the term rename to mean changing the name instead of altering the way it reads so it looks different.


Besides altering the looks for repackagings (such as combining 2 previous volumes into one volume or into thinpaks), there's also a business reason for re-issues. Some stores like Wal-Mart simply will not re-stock "old" SKUs. In order for those retailers to even just put your product on the shelf --the same product that you released 2 or 3 years ago-- you have to make it seem like a new product.

Stop with the conspiracy, please.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

covered or not if the fansub releases the original format of the series and the licensed release is only an altered version I'll support the fansubers because I want to see what the original artists produced not some watered down version because some bean counter felt it was more marketable.


I think that's not a problem for people here. Fortunately, that doesn't happen much nowadays.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheresaJayne



Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 70
Location: UK Berkshire
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:56 am Reply with quote
12 pages with only a couple of interesting posts, geez,
The problem as has been mentioned more than once is the lack of getting it outside of the USA.

I saw an advert here on ANN today, Watch Ramen Fighter Miki Part 7
I clicked it and it said "Sorry due to licencing restrictions we cannot let you see what we just said you could watch" This is why fansubs will be alive and well into the next century, when the license holders finally realise that if they spend the extra dollar on a world wide license then they will see less fansubs and more people buying,

BTW anyone know where i can get fansubs of Ramen Fighter Miki?
(j/k lol)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger My Anime
Parvati-IV



Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 72
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:45 am Reply with quote
So, let's say everything in the next two anime seasons was made available as a same day stream. While that would make the fans happy, where would the money for the companies come from? Do ads make that much? If it means a delayed or lack of R1 release, would Japanese sales alone be enough? I've heard that some coapnies consider overseas sales and calculate them in when making a show. Would an R1 licensor want to touch it if it was already available for free on the internet? So far we haven't seen any of the legit streams on crunchyroll get a DVD release. Would we see the amount of anime being made shrink dramatically?

I don't know the answers, but I wanted to toss out some food for thought. What do you guys think would happen with that scenario?


Last edited by Parvati-IV on Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:48 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragoneyes001



Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 873
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:46 am Reply with quote
Quote:
dragoneyes001 wrote:

they have barely released 50 episodes that puts them nearly 3 years behind the series sorry don't feel like dieing of old age before they decide to get to next weeks episode.


But of course you still bought those Funi 50 eps since you fully support One Piece done right, right? Very Happy


dragoneyes001 wrote:

it took fansub fans totally bashing the 4kids series all over the internet before funimation decided to.


Oh please, 4Kids couldn't care less about fansub fans - or even just anime fans. 4Kids dropped One Piece because they couldn't sell merchandise licenses of it for children's products. FUNi just picked it up afterwards. Let's see how many fans actually support the DVDs like they say they would. Razz


dragoneyes001 wrote:

ADV and AnimEigo for sure have repackaged some series in ways they become deceptive. there are others as well and your probably mistaking the term rename to mean changing the name instead of altering the way it reads so it looks different.


Besides altering the looks for repackagings (such as combining 2 previous volumes into one volume or into thinpaks), there's also a business reason for re-issues. Some stores like Wal-Mart simply will not re-stock "old" SKUs. In order for those retailers to even just put your product on the shelf --the same product that you released 2 or 3 years ago-- you have to make it seem like a new product.

Stop with the conspiracy, please.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

covered or not if the fansub releases the original format of the series and the licensed release is only an altered version I'll support the fansubers because I want to see what the original artists produced not some watered down version because some bean counter felt it was more marketable.


I think that's not a problem for people here. Fortunately, that doesn't happen much nowadays.


1)you quoted something mistakenly it was about bleach only having about 50 eps.

2) 4KIDS was getting huge bad press with youtube parodies of their one piece release getting hundreds of thousands of hits <<< kind of thing their PR people notice. yes they do buckle to public ridicule when the numbers are big enough.
as for funimations release isn't it also dubbed? don't think I could handle a new voice for lufy after nearly 400 eps. here try looking at this it sounds horrible: http://www.onepieceofficial.com/movie/


3)conspiracy? repackaging something in a manner it can be deceiving is fraudulent not conspiratorial.

4) if your in R1 then it is happening here because its companies like 4kids who make junk of good anime to market it

Quote:
So, let's say everything in the next two anime seasons was made available as a same day stream. While that would make the fans happy, where would the money for the companies come from? Do ads make that much? If it means a delayed or lack of R1 release, would Japanese sales alone be enough? I've heard that some coapnies consider overseas sales and calculate them in when making a show. Would an R1 licensor want to touch it if it was already available for free on the internet? So far we haven't seen any of the legit streams on crunchyroll get a DVD release. Would we see the amount of anime being made shrink dramatically?

I don't know the answers, but I wanted to toss out some food for thought. What do you guys think would happen with that scenario?


CR is using the money from subscribers to pay TV Tokyo for streams aired an hour after live airing in japan if they do manage to get 40k subscribers in 3 yrs at an average of $59 each for a years subscription they will have 2.36 million dollars to pay for TV Tokyo's streams that year that's not exactly huge money but will definitely be paying for stream rights and also makes those series available to those who can't pay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
petran79



Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 122
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:05 am Reply with quote
jvowles wrote:
iindigo wrote:
LordRedhand wrote:
So you got into fansubbing becuase Adult Swim had to wait for their next batch of episodes of a series you knew was continuing? That reeks of entitlement there.


I don't understand why thinking I should be able to watch episodes on a schedule somewhat close to the original broadcast is "entitlement". The only differences between a Japanese viewer and I are:
1) They speak Japanese, I don't
2) I live on the other side of the big puddle, which makes absolutely no difference in the digital age.


3. They pay for the anime when they watch it on TV, you don't.
a. They pay through subscription fees to some channels
b. They watch broadcasts that are supported by advertising -- usually products for Japanese consumers.

4. They buy merchandise by the truckload, we don't' (though arguably we WOULD if given the opportunity).

5. They buy DVDs and other media at a much higher price point than we do here.

In short: You are not entitled to a product just because you WANT it, and you aren't entitled to get it for free just because someone ELSE does.




Every country with a deleveloped media industry does the same.

and some other similarities:

They rent DVDs, burn them illegaly and return those to the video rental store. Lets see. 10 DVDs would have cost 300 $. 10 rented DVDs only 30 $. Plus they can visit any neighbouring Asian country to get bootlegs by the tons.

They also download torrents, whether DVD-rips, Raw or fansubbed.

Who buys a lot of merchandise? The otaku? Because every country has otaku. Sure they contribute a lot but I'd never bother watching anime if it was targetted at the otaku market or buy otaku crap to say that I contribute to the industry..

Even if new anime distributions through torrents ceased to exist, something which I doubt (Napster and Audiogalaxy are classic examples), there would still be a lot of older and forgotten series waiting to be fansubbed. There is a considerable part of older viewers who prefer to buy old or forgotten anime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordRedhand



Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 1472
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Indiana
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:11 am Reply with quote
Well in terms of viewing, I'd say the dub actually is closer to getting as close as possible experience as the Japanese viewer and let me explain why.

1. Short of learning Japanese myself to a level that is good enough to watch an anime series Raw I need another way to view the series.

2. Becuase most anime do not have lines of text at the bottom of the screen, watching a series with subtitles is not the same experience as watching a series itself, and definetely not the same experience of the viewer in Japan.

3. I know what some of you will say about reading subtitles, but regardless of how fast a reader you are your eyes are drawn down, away from the action and animation that the director intended for you to see.

4. Therefore a dub in my native language (English) is as close as possible a viewing experience as I can get to the Japanese. On TV it's even better prospect.

As to subtitles, (like with Punie-Chan, subtitle only release) I want the subtitles to be as clear/readable as possible, and to not detract from the viewing itself. Subtitles that try to blend in actually run counter to this, becuase then I have to focus harder to read them, thus missing more of what I'm suppossed to be seeing. Others have described the limitations of the DVD subtitling better than I.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crilix



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 208
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:28 am Reply with quote
LordRedhand wrote:
4. Therefore a dub in my native language (English) is as close as possible a viewing experience as I can get to the Japanese.
Sorry, readibility isn't the only factor when it comes to being "as close as possible". There are undoubtedly cultural aspects involved here, since no subtitles means no notes, and such. Also, many Japanese broadcasts have the option of closed captions that are very useful for Japanese themselves when it comes to anime with weird terminology.


Last edited by crilix on Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:30 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordRedhand



Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 1472
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Indiana
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:29 am Reply with quote
crilix wrote:
LordRedhand wrote:
4. Therefore a dub in my native language (English) is as close as possible a viewing experience as I can get to the Japanese. On TV it's even better prospect.
Sorry, readibility isn't the only factor here. Also, many Japanese broadcasts have the option of closed captions that are very useful for Japanese themselves when it comes to anime with weird terminology.


Are closed captions though the standard? i.e. every anime has them all the time....

As shows over here have the option for closed captions but you couldn't say it was the norm to say watch the Simpsons with lines of text at the bottom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crilix



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 208
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:32 am Reply with quote
It depends on the station, but yes, they are a widely used standard. Even fansubbers use them to translate from for a number of anime series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 15233
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:36 am Reply with quote
dragoneyes001 wrote:

1)you quoted something mistakenly it was about bleach only having about 50 eps.


Oops, my bad. Smile


dragoneyes001 wrote:

2) 4KIDS was getting huge bad press with youtube parodies of their one piece release getting hundreds of thousands of hits <<< kind of thing their PR people notice. yes they do buckle to public ridicule when the numbers are big enough.


Uh, not 4Kids. Anime fans have been ridiculing them to hell and back for years. They don't care about anime fans. They only care about kids whom they could sell licensed merchandise to.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

as for funimations release isn't it also dubbed? don't think I could handle a new voice for lufy after nearly 400 eps. here try looking at this it sounds horrible: http://www.onepieceofficial.com/movie/


It's dubbed and subbed, so you can keep listening to the Luffy you got used to.

And no, I don't think the Funi dub is horrible. You're just too used to the original Luffy after nearly 400 eps. That's fine; we're often predisposed to the first voice we encounter.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

3)conspiracy? repackaging something in a manner it can be deceiving is fraudulent not conspiratorial.


If it's fraudulent, it's fraudulent to the stores who won't re-stock old SKUs. They're not trying to fool you - they're trying to fool those stores.


dragoneyes001 wrote:

4) if your in R1 then it is happening here because its companies like 4kids who make junk of good anime to market it


Dude, 4Kids hardly releases anime anymore. They make up like less than 1% of the industry now. It's time for you to move on.

You even cited AnimEigo. AnimEigo! Who releases a new anime only every 4 years! Like the Yawara Olympics! Methinks your info is outdated. Laughing


Last edited by enurtsol on Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordRedhand



Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 1472
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Indiana
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:38 am Reply with quote
While I can believe that fansubbers would use a closed captioned raw to start their "translation" process, I doubt that the standard viewer uses them, even with anime "weird" terminology, as some things are meant to be found out, not explained right away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragoneyes001



Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 873
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:10 am Reply with quote
Quote:
Uh, not 4Kids. Anime fans have been ridiculing them to hell and back for years. They don't care about anime fans. They only care about kids whom they could sell licensed merchandise to.


I know for a fact that kids seeing one piece on 4KIDS were barely able to understand the story line it was so distorted since people I know who's kids watched it said so themselves also from people posting about it online and those people were not watching it for long because it was so disjointed. so its kind of hard to sell stuff to an audience that's not watching the show.

but then again you don't seem to be able to connect the dots between a fan and a merchandise purchaser! they go hand in hand since people who like something will watch it on TV even if they have seen it online/downloaded and the same fans are the ones who would buy the licensed merchandise because its not going to be the naruto fans buying one piece products unless they happen to also be one piece fans.

also your missing the other point!(peer pressure) when there was hundreds of thousands of hits on the anti 4Kids one piece stuff kids who might have watched it considered it unpopular and stopped watching it. kind of like how the Internets number one insult is FAG not because all those kids are homophobic but its repeated so frequently its a knee jerk reaction for them to use it.kids are very susceptible to peer trends.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordRedhand



Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 1472
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Indiana
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:20 am Reply with quote
dragoneyes001 wrote:


I know for a fact that kids seeing one piece on 4KIDS were barely able to understand the story line it was so distorted since people I know who's kids watched it said so themselves also from people posting about it online and those people were not watching it for long because it was so disjointed. so its kind of hard to sell stuff to an audience that's not watching the show.


Ummm I can tell you as being a kid once, I didn't particarly care for the story of series like Sailor Moon, Voltron, He-Man and The Masters of the Universe or TMNT. Most kids wouldn't notice or care about the changes to the series or the story. All they care abnout is entertainment value, and if they can watch One Piece and say "I was entertained." then the show did what it was suppossed to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cait



Joined: 29 May 2008
Posts: 503
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 am Reply with quote
LordRedhand wrote:


Ummm I can tell you as being a kid once, I didn't particarly care for the story of series like Sailor Moon, Voltron, He-Man and The Masters of the Universe or TMNT. Most kids wouldn't notice or care about the changes to the series or the story. All they care abnout is entertainment value, and if they can watch One Piece and say "I was entertained." then the show did what it was suppossed to.


Exactly, a commercial failure is a commercial failure, regardless of the supposed "influence" of fansubbers' complaints. People who have already seen a different version of an anime (fansub, raw) are always going to complain about any and all differences from that version, regardless of merit or quality. The reason the 4Kids license of One Piece and the Nelvanna license of Card Captor Sakura failed was ultimately due to their own inabilities to put out an altered product that was viable in the market to the mainstream (because that is who those companies market to, not the niche anime market). What the anime "elitists" think is only going to drive one very small niche market (the Pioneer subs of CCS and the complete redub of OP by FUNi, neither of which really had the greater financial impact to prove they "fixed" the mainstream problem of the original edits). Either way, it is an old and flat argument to blame non-anime publishers for publishing non-anime products. They are few and far between in even existence and don't apply to the R1 anime industry's actual efforts to put out products that are as close to the originals as is possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Unit 03.5-ish



Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 1540
Location: This space for rent
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:29 am Reply with quote
crilix wrote:
Unit 03.5-ish wrote:
Again, I'd love to see solid proof that fansubs are the deciding factor in what is and isn't licensed.
They are most likely not the deciding factor, but they are one of them. Funimation and Media Blasters representatives have stated so on Otakon 2008 Fansub and Industry panel.

:crymoar:


So I guess this means if fansubs disappeared overnight, companies would no longer have a means by which to judge what anime to bring over here. Because like I said, market trends and marketability apparently don't matter. I think it's rather arrogant on the part of fansubbers and fansub watchers to think that they are what drives the decisions of R1 companies to bring titles here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger My Anime
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 12 of 38

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group