| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Lemonchest
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 1771
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:00 am |
 |
|
|
Please be better than Young Black Jack. Please be better than that.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
SkerllyF
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 244
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:37 am |
|
|
| Lemonchest wrote: | | Please be better than Young Black Jack. Please be better than that. |
Wait, it was bad? I thought it was good. It may not be a true prequel, but because it had fanservice, doesn't mean it was bad
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Andrew Cunningham
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 559
Location: Seattle
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:36 am |
|
|
|
The manga's a lot of fun, and Sato's one of the better directors around. Should be solid.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Lemonchest
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 1771
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:27 am |
|
|
| SkerllyF wrote: | | Lemonchest wrote: | | Please be better than Young Black Jack. Please be better than that. |
Wait, it was bad? I thought it was good. It may not be a true prequel, but because it had fanservice, doesn't mean it was bad |
If you're a fan of Ryosuke Takahashi's brand of misanthropy, more power to you. For me it was an increasingly tedious exercise in watching a mouthpiece visit various places & events of significance during the 60s & lecturing them as only a sad old man whose never left Tokyo could (regardless of how much of it came from the manga).
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
DangerMouse
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 4022
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:33 pm |
|
|
| Andrew Cunningham wrote: | | The manga's a lot of fun, and Sato's one of the better directors around. Should be solid. |
Cool.
Yeah, I like pretty much the entire staff on this.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
