Forum

Dan42 wrote:

You select "Oppose" if you think the information is ERRONEOUS (and therefore the error report is justified)

You select "Endorse" if you think the information is ACCURATE (and therefore the error report is a false alarm)

I'm begging you to please change the rating for Aki Sora, I feel both sources I've presented are enough to justify it as hentai.

Shiroi Hane wrote:

Information on the publisher should be correct and I would hope that the author, release date etc. would be also, but I wouldn't use it on its own if something better is available (which for really old titles can be difficult)

Many publishers don't have a catalog for their old titles (and I'm talking about pre-1990), and Amazon.jp is often better than most similar websites. At very least it gives you ISBN and other publication info so you could dig Yahoo! Japan Auctions.

GrilledEelHamatsu wrote:

I'm begging you to please change the rating for Aki Sora, I feel both sources I've presented are enough to justify it as hentai.

The two sources you provided were 1) English Wikipedia and 2) a scanlation site. Even the latter labeled it as "mature" instead of "adults only." The rating stays as "mature" unless you could find a Japanese website labeling it with [アダルト]. Read this thread before you submit more reports with the same reason.

I'm still waiting for more information to decide if Aki Sora ~Yume no Naka~ warrants an independent entry.