| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
pip25
Joined: 22 Sep 2017
Posts: 268
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2026 5:55 am |
 |
|
|
How can you join the police at the age of 17? Or am I asking the wrong question?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
PilotPayback
Joined: 21 Oct 2025
Posts: 138
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2026 6:15 am |
|
|
|
i was curious about this, so i went to anilist to add it, and thought, "wait, this has fanservice elements?"...which made my curiosity peak even more. wasn't expecting that...
like, for anyone who read the source material, on a scale of one (weakest) to 5 (most), how much are we talking about here? i'm assuming it's like a 2 or a 3...kinda like neet kunoichi. i'm only asking this because it feels (i guess) weird to think of a show like this as a fanservice show.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Blanchimont
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3844
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2026 6:31 am |
|
|
| PilotPayback wrote: | | like, for anyone who read the source material, on a scale of one (weakest) to 5 (most), how much are we talking about here? i'm assuming it's like a 2 or a 3...kinda like neet kunoichi. |
Been a while I read this(it's on my backlog) but I think somewhere between 2-3. It's a detective rom-com, and there's only the one pairing so no harem, it focuses more on the comedy.
This manga is a remake of the author's previous manga, Rinna Keibu wa Iki ga Dekinai(15 chapters).
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
PilotPayback
Joined: 21 Oct 2025
Posts: 138
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2026 8:31 am |
|
|
| Blanchimont wrote: | |
Been a while I read this(it's on my backlog) but I think somewhere between 2-3. It's a detective rom-com, and there's only the one pairing so no harem, it focuses more on the comedy.
This manga is a remake of the author's previous manga, Rinna Keibu wa Iki ga Dekinai(15 chapters). |
that makes sense. was wondering why anilist had the "ecchi" tag attached to it. because it looked like a fairly normal romance show to me. i'm still gonna watch the show because i find it interesting, but still.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
