| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
That Little Rapscallion
Joined: 31 Jul 2023
Posts: 151
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 1:19 am |
|
|
|
So is this going to get pulled in future versions of the episode? I'm sure the episode will be preserved if it is but I wonder where they go from here.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
WANNFH
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 2086
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:58 am |
|
|
| That Little Rapscallion wrote: | | So is this going to get pulled in future versions of the episode? I'm sure the episode will be preserved if it is but I wonder where they go from here. | Considering MBS still not pulled out the original video from their Youtube channel after all this gas, unlike usual cases of parody "infringements" like what happened to Gintama or Osomatsu-san - most likely it is settled out behind the scenes peacefully.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
NeverConvex
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 2690
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:56 am |
|
|
|
The song itself is entirely show-original, right? Assuming that's true, it's kind've wild to me that under Japanese parody laws this is an issue at all (though consistent with my impression of Japanese IP law more broadly).
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
WANNFH
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 2086
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 9:44 am |
|
|
| NeverConvex wrote: | | The song itself is entirely show-original, right? Assuming that's true, it's kind've wild to me that under Japanese parody laws this is an issue at all (though consistent with my impression of Japanese IP law more broadly). | Welcome to the no Fair Use policy country after all, especially when ever there you got the batshit lawyers trying to take a piece of a pie.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Silver Kirin
Joined: 09 Aug 2018
Posts: 1782
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 12:02 pm |
|
|
| WANNFH wrote: | | Welcome to the no Fair Use policy country after all, especially when ever there you got the batshit lawyers trying to take a piece of a pie. |
Japanese companies being so protective of their intellectual properties and how different their copyright laws are compared to the rest of the world are some of the reasons why Nintendo is so infamous for taking down fan-games, having difficulties with content creators that centered around their games and basically suing anyone? Right?
To be fair, it's not only Nintendo, companies like Toei and Tsuburaya are also known for protecting their IPs. But in the case of Dan Da Dan's I find interesting because it is a Japanese production, I would have assumed that they would be more aware that X Japan's members or the record companies could have gone after them for their parody. Though I do remember many years ago that the Osomatsu-san anime staff got into trouble for a Anpanman parody in its first season.
Honestly, Japanese copyright laws or whatever are very confusing, because doujinshi is huge
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
mdo7
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 8241
Location: Katy, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 12:45 pm |
|
|
| Silver Kirin wrote: | | Japanese companies being so protective of their intellectual properties and how different their copyright laws are compared to the rest of the world are some of the reasons why Nintendo is so infamous for taking down fan-games, having difficulties with content creators that centered around their games and basically suing anyone? Right?
To be fair, it's not only Nintendo, companies like Toei and Tsuburaya are also known for protecting their IPs. But in the case of Dan Da Dan's I find interesting because it is a Japanese production, I would have assumed that they would be more aware that X Japan's members or the record companies could have gone after them for their parody. Though I do remember many years ago that the Osomatsu-san anime staff got into trouble for a Anpanman parody in its first season.
Honestly, Japanese copyright laws or whatever are very confusing, because doujinshi is huge |
It's not only confusing, it creates a lot of problem and can lead to lost media when it comes to older anime titles not being able to get release due to their complicated copyright law.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Wily
Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 872
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:46 pm |
|
|
|
Isn't Sony part of the Dandadan production committee? Is this a company making itself apologize?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Meexa
Joined: 13 Mar 2016
Posts: 331
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2025 4:22 am |
|
|
|
I feel this is a publicity stunt. But time will tell.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Daidan12
Joined: 13 Aug 2024
Posts: 170
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2025 11:05 am |
|
|
| Silver Kirin wrote: | | some of the reasons why Nintendo is so infamous for taking down fan-games, having difficulties with content creators that centered around their games and basically suing anyone? Right? |
Nintendo does it mostly when it clearly will hurt the brand, they don't want people playing a "Pokemon Grey Dusk" where the storyline is about drug trafficking.
The other case is one where the fangame is just too similar with an official product like the infamous AM2R.
The other side is the rare frivolous looking lawsuit like Palworlds, having patents on general game mechanics is stupid, but the suit also revealed that Palworld DID plagiarize Pokemon or intent to do it as much as possible with orders to the artists to make "knock-off Pokemon".
tldr.- Nintendo will send justified suits 90% of the time.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Cardcaptor Takato
Joined: 27 Jan 2018
Posts: 5989
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2025 5:57 pm |
|
|
|
I love X Japan and have much respect for Yoshiki but he’s being kind of daft about what a parody is.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
MFrontier
Joined: 13 Apr 2014
Posts: 20109
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2025 10:48 pm |
|
|
|
Kind of wild how this blew up...
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|