Forum - View topic
Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood -[adult swim] (w/index).


Goto page Previous    Next

Anime News Network Forum Index -> General -> Series Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Maidenoftheredhand



Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 2636
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:07 pm Reply with quote
amarielah wrote:

I agree that his revenge plot wasn't very subtle in either version, though it was definitely subtler in the first series. In the sense that it was left ambiguous (though still addressed) until the climax of the story.


And for the record the "revenge plot" is not addressed in the manga until the final arc. The word "revenge" does not even enter Roy or any other character's mouth until this point. So trying to act like the manga was in your face about "revenge" is ridiculous. Roy trying to find out who killed Hughes is not the same as it's all about revenge.
So no I don't understand how the first anime is more subtle just because Roy briefly mentions about revenge towards the end of the series. Again the only difference is finding out who killed Hughes ends up being a bigger part of the Manga's plot (the whole revenge aspect comes much later).

And for the record saying it's an "after thought" was not an insult to the first series. I am just saying it was not as important to the main storyline. It wasn't left ambiguous, it was just left briefly for the end. Can we not say that the two series have different focuses?

I mean really I can say the character of Hughes is just more subtle in the manga because they spent less time on him.

Quote:
And I think what Charred Knight is getting at with "the villains being very obviously villains" is that Arakawa's villains do tend to have fewer shades of grey. The whole good/evil divide in the manga, by that definition, isn't very subtle.


If you are saying the main villains don't have sad back stories then yes I would agree with you. And yes the villains are more straight villains types but most of them do have more to their characters besides 'just being evil." But really does a villain have to be gray to be well written? Don't get me wrong I love gray characters but we don't have to "feel sorry" for every villain.

Also there are gray characters in the manga: Scar, Roy, and Riza come to mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
amarielah



Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Posts: 178
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:19 pm Reply with quote
Maidenoftheredhand wrote:


And for the record the "revenge plot" is not addressed in the manga until the final arc. The word "revenge" does not even enter Roy or any other character's mouth until this point. So trying to act like the manga was in your face about "revenge" is ridiculous. Roy trying to find out how killed Hughes is not the same as it's all about revenge.
So no I don't understand how the first anime is more subtle just because Roy briefly mentions about revenge towards the end of the series. Again the only difference is finding out who killed Hughes ends up being a bigger part of the Manga's plot (the whole revenge aspect comes much later).


It is more subtle in the sense that it doesn't make Mustang's motives as clear as the manga does. That's all. Instead you have spoiler[ Sciezka desperately looking for some answers, and Mustang kissing General Hakuro's ass when he moves to a new office in Central Headquarters, apparently unfazed by Hughes' death (much to Sciezka's distress). ]

Quote:
And for the record saying it's an "after thought" was not an insult to the first series. I am just saying it was not as important to the main storyline. It wasn't left ambiguous, it was just left briefly for the end. Can we not say that the two series have different focuses?


Honestly, I don't think the actual subject of Hughes as it relates to Mustang's actions was given more focus in the manga--it was just that the scenes were handled differently. Whether meant negatively or not, I don't think that Hughes death was any less important to Mustang's actions in the anime. If anything, Hughes' death spoiler[ serves as the primary catalyst for renewing Mustang's (apparent) desire to "get to the top".]

Quote:
If you are saying the main villains don't have sad back stories then yes I would agree with you. And yes the villains are more straight villains types but most of them do have more to their characters besides 'just being evil." But really does a villain have to be gray to be well written?


Not at all. In fact, we agree on this completely. I think that the villains in the manga are actually very well written (most of the time, at least), and work within the context of the story. But, strictly speaking, they're less subtle than many of the villains in the first series, with the exception of Kimbley.

Quote:
Also there are gray characters in the manga: Scar, Roy, and Riza come to mind.


Agreed. But Scar's more of an antihero than a villain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maidenoftheredhand



Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 2636
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:49 pm Reply with quote
Unfortunately explaining what I mean about "why Roy's revenge for Hughes" is a bigger subplot in the manga is again going to lead to spoilers (kind of an issue on this thread). I can discuss it with you on the other thread to explain what I mean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dune



Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 223
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:54 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
Anyway, it wasn't a big deal, I wasn't really annoyed until Mustang's line (and it may be dub-only, but I doubt it,) "I think Hughes deserves an answer. I'm going to do this because I have to. This is something I have to do."

It's basically the same in the sub, which was taken almost directly from the manga. WRT the source material, while Mustang stating his goal out loud isn't exactly necessary, the manga at least deserves credit for the ambiguity concerning whether/how far Mustang is willing to use violence to reach his goals.

These are details which Brotherhood spoiler[will skip over almost entirely. ARGH]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
amarielah



Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Posts: 178
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:04 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
Unfortunately explaining what I mean about "why Roy's revenge for Hughes" is a bigger subplot in the manga is again going to lead to spoilers (kind of an issue on this thread). I can discuss it with you on the other thread to explain what I mean.


If by "bigger subplot" you mean "has more effect on the overall plot", then you needn't worry. I'm well aware of that.

I'm speaking only about Hughes' death as it relates to Mustang's motivations, which is about equal in either version. Mustang just has less of an effect on the plot in the first anime period.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maidenoftheredhand



Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 2636
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:42 pm Reply with quote
[quote="Dune"]
Quote:
While Mustang stating his goal out loud isn't exactly necessary, the manga at least deserves credit for the ambiguity concerning whether/how far Mustang is willing to use violence to reach his goals.


I actually do find it absolutely necessary. People are saying that we could just discover Roy's motivations by his actions and that's true. But what Roy is trying to do was not the important part of that conversation.

Roy spelling out exactly what he is doing leads to Riza saying
"It's not like you to mix personal & business"


Roy then responds "It's the exact same thing". That finding Hughes' killer will lead him to the top.

It's only later we find out the truth behind this conversation. So yes there is ambiguity in this conversation because we don't know what Roy's real motivations behind finding Hughes killer really are. And often in the manga characters will say one thing but mean something else in the end.


And okay Amarielah, I debate with you too much as is anyways. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DangerMouse



Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 4022
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 11:27 pm Reply with quote
Ah Izumi, missed her character and the beatings she delivers (along with her motherly moments with Ed and Al), good to see her and the big guy.

Since this is such a dialogue heavy episode I thought it's a good time to give props to Maxey's progression on Al from the beginning to now. She was like dead on as Al throughout this episode both as current and young Al. She deserves a ton of credit, not only has she gradually brought her voice in line with Aaron's Al but she's doing a great job using the character voice she's put together. I think in this episode a lot of people might actually swear it was original Al if they didn't know they had to change voice actors. The scenes with them talking with Izumi were just like before in terms of how strong they were.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SoandSo



Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 204
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 11:45 pm Reply with quote
Ohhhh yes, this episode. So, the bros freak out, see a line of ants, and that's it. That's how they put the whole "All is One" thing together. I always loved that. HARDYHARHAR Anime hyper Well, that and how they actually use that ole' "You're looking good enough to eat" cliche.

Otherwise, same old same old. Dub is nice, and the show feels oddly fast and truncated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
penguintruth



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8627
Location: Penguinopolis
PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 3:10 am Reply with quote
I really love the Dublith/Greed arc of the manga and first TV series. Aside from the Ishbal war, it's my favorite part of the FMA story. But I really dislike the way Brotherhood handles this part. I know why they did it this way, but that doesn't make me like it. It's really shitty how they speed through some of my favorite parts

However, I have to praise Christine Auten for her performance as Izumi. I liked her in the first series dub and I might even like her more here, because her performance is so strong. It's really great. She even sounds a lot like the Japanese voice actress. She's come a long way as a VA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address My Anime My Manga
Charred Knight



Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 3085
PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 5:39 am Reply with quote
Never really understood why they removed so many scenes from some parts of the story, I mean did we really need to move everything up one episode? Especially when while some of the new scenes from later episodes are fine, the parts they took out are still better.

I was especially sad because the reveal of who the masked man was much funnier in the manga.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DangerMouse



Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 4022
PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 6:48 pm Reply with quote
penguintruth wrote:
However, I have to praise Christine Auten for her performance as Izumi. I liked her in the first series dub and I might even like her more here, because her performance is so strong. It's really great. She even sounds a lot like the Japanese voice actress. She's come a long way as a VA.


Yeah I really liked her as Izumi the first time so I'm really glad she's back, she did a fantastic job this episode.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dune



Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 223
PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2010 11:43 pm Reply with quote
Yay, King Bradley.

Episode 14 is one of my favorite Brotherhood episodes. Watching it dubbed was very enjoyable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DangerMouse



Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 4022
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 12:41 am Reply with quote
Dune wrote:
Yay, King Bradley.

Episode 14 is one of my favorite Brotherhood episodes. Watching it dubbed was very enjoyable.


Totally agree, fantastic episode and they did a great job with it.

Speaking of Bradley his VA did a great job with his various tones, and sticking with those guys, Greed's had some great lines.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
penguintruth



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8627
Location: Penguinopolis
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 1:56 am Reply with quote
Ugh, I never liked Ed Blaylock's Bradley. It lacks that deep, commanding quality to it that the Japanese voice has. It kind of sounds like a bad Sean Connery impression. Chris Patton's Greed has been surprisingly competent, though, given how terribly he performed in the first series. Greed is my favorite character, and I would have preferred a deeper voice for him, too, but Patton at least sounds like he's trying to act this time around.

Episode 14 was pretty good, but not flawless. They leave out how Bradley even knew about the Devil's Nest, which in the manga he hears about in a conversation between Ed and Izumi at the meat shop, after she comes back injured from trying to rescue Al from Greed. Ed had just come back from South HQ where he met up with Bradley and Armstrong and got his assessment stamped "passed" without doing anything. Bradley and Armstrong following him back to Dublith leads to the meeting of Armstrong and Sig Curtis.

Without these things, the Fuhrer and Armstrong seem to just appear out of nowhere.

I really dislike the rushing through this arc, my favorite part of the manga, outside of the Ishbal flashback. They even make Greed seem weaker.

Ep 14 was a lot better than the garbage that was episode 13, at least.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address My Anime My Manga
braves



Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 2309
Location: Puerto Rico (but living in Texas)
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 11:40 am Reply with quote
Seeing as how FUNimation isn't crediting the key animators for the DVD/Blu-ray release, I guess I'll chime in say that this episode is where Yoshimichi Kameda caught my eye, though I didn't know it was him until later. He animated spoiler[Greed vs. Bradley].

He's a young animator who's gotten a real chance to shine in Brotherhood. It's apt to compare him to Yutaka Nakamura and what he did in the first FMA series, although I would argue that Nakamura already had a reputation established by the time he got to work on FMA and that Kameda's contribution on this particular series is more substantial. Nakamura has done much better work elsewhere (like say, the FMA movie where he had a hand in the spoiler[Gluttony] fight).

You'll really get to see Kameda leave his stamp on the series in ep. 19-- his part is unmistakable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> General -> Series Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 18 of 28

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group