Forum - View topicTalk about Moe.
|
Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next |
| Author | Message | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
4nBlue
|
||||||||||||||
|
I got the idea for this topic from Clannad Collection 1 talkback.
The definition of moe seems to be all over the place. The fact that there is no clear definition makes talking about it reeally hard. It can be very irritating to hear that some series is a "moe show" when most of the cast don't fit the original and most negative meaning of moe. I am also very confused, because the internet seems to have agreed to Mio (from K-On) being the winner of this years Saimoe, even though she fits the original meaning of moe the least from the main cast. Here are some of the definitions of moe I am familiar with: Original moe Protective feeling you get from "little sister"-character. Most of the Sister Princess cast are a perfect example of this. "Fetish" Way of talking about personal tastes like megane-moe (love for characters with glasses) or tsundere-moe (love of tsundere, duh). I like this/This is cute Can be used in pretty much any context. Just scream, "MOEEEE!", when you see something you like very much. This seems to be the most the most common and confusing definition, because it works for anything from handsome guys to pets. You can see this used often in Ouran High School Host Club. I hope this this topic would stay on the topic of moe and not derail to the usual ANN anti-moe conspiracies. Also if anyone has a link to Ken Akamatsu talking about moe could you please post it, because it has been few years since I last read it and he made some interesting points like the Love Hina girls not being moe, because the girls are too independent. Last edited by 4nBlue on Tue May 05, 2009 4:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||||||||
|
Kruszer
Posts: 8016 Location: Minnesota, USA |
||||||||||||||
|
I've always taken it to mean cute, rather unintelligent or clumsy, girls with oversized eyes and high-pitched annoying voices.
|
||||||||||||||
|
walw6pK4Alo
Posts: 9322 |
||||||||||||||
Yui from K-ON! or Tsukasa from Lucky Star are supposed to be walking embodiments of moe, stupid and cute. |
||||||||||||||
|
abunai
Old Regular
Posts: 5463 Location: 露命 |
||||||||||||||
|
Stupidity is not a requirement for moe... I would say that the defining characteristic of moe is vulnerability. You can find plenty of indisputably moe characters in anime who are physically or mentally strong. What unites them all, however, is that (in one way or another) they are vulnerable.
Tomoyo from Clannad is invincibly, monstrously strong -- yet she is awkward and unsure of herself. She is not exactly the classical tsundere stereotype, for she lacks the abrasive personality -- but she does fit the mold partway. Likewise, there are plenty of weak-bodied girls with strong personalities, whose vulnerable moe-ness derives from their physical frailty. Offhand, the best example I can think of is Akiba Rika from Hanbun no Tsuki ga Noboru Sora. In a way, moe is a response to the empowerment of women in inter-gender relationships that we have seen in the past half century. In the 1950s, a man could safely expect to be the dominant (or if not exactly dominant, then active) partner in the process of forming a relationship. As women became liberated, this changed, and modern sexual diplomacy is a minefield that leaves us poor men challenged at best and despondent at worst. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that moe strikes such a chord in the male viewers (though I would strongly maintain that moe is not unavoidably a male-oriented phenomenon). They see, in the character's vulnerability, a chance to play the rôle that conventional male upbringing still holds up as the male ideal: the rôle of protector, mentor, and devoted lover. What it boils down to is that moe opens a chink in the otherwise-daunting armour of modern feminine empowerment, and the male audience appreciates that. - abunai |
||||||||||||||
|
DomFortress
Posts: 751 Location: Richmond BC, Canada |
||||||||||||||
|
If someone need to based on mangaka Ken Akamatsu's comment to decide what "moe" means, then he needs a new perspective. Because not just the fact that almost all of the girls in Ken Akamatsu's Love Hina are very dependent on their parents, families, and each others in terms of support, the only independent woman in Love Hina was in fact a support character; Haruka Urashima.
Not only that, as a matter of fact, Ken Akamatsu brought "moe", what was used to be an very objective term applied to female characters in anime and manga media culture to real life, by subjecting his wife, Kanon Akamatsu, with all sorts of "moe" cospaly elements and thus made her into a living "moe" cosplay centerpiece. You want to talk about decent portrays of women who are independent in manga and anime? Try Tsukasa Hojo's City Hunter and Cat's Eye for size. |
||||||||||||||
|
PetrifiedJello
Posts: 3782 |
||||||||||||||
*ponders if my replies sparked this topic.
This is where I sit and why I posted what I did. I'm still not sure why a series has to be classified with anything, but since it's here, not much I can do but try to understand it. This learning puts me into hot water, it seems, as people's opinions are so passionate, they're quick to jump on the reply button to give me a piece of their mind. I can deal. Sometimes the attitudes get tiring, but that's okay. With Blood-'s help, I'm trying to be tactful. However, I'm getting to the point where tact is doing no good.
Another issue I have. Who in hell placed moe in a negative definition? The problem with this negativity is that it spreads and people treat it as fact. Clannad has "moe" (as defined in lexicon). But is this a bad thing? I guess I just can't see it. To me, it adds to the appeal of the show, but at the same time, I can see how people may see it as irritating if the show is only "moe" based (it's not).
To me, this show has no "moe" in it at all. What the hell do people think is going to happen when 12 sisters, ranging in age, meet their brother for the first time?
This is where I get lost too. Shouldn't this fall under "fanservice" (a term I can't freakin' stand)?
You're sure to get some feedback with this one. Be warned not all may be pleasant.
Well, expect some side topics to occur. This topic requires quite a bit of feedback to converse, so keep that in mind when you read the replies. And Love Hina, to some, is "moe"? Now I'm really confused! |
||||||||||||||
|
Mushi-Man
Posts: 1537 Location: KCMO |
||||||||||||||
|
The term "moe" has been changed, diluted, and adapted in many different ways over the years to the point where there is no real definition for it. Different people look at this term in different ways. It's now to the point where defining it is no longer a point of technicality but rather a point of opinion.
Because of all the different opinions and definitions of "moe" it's very easy for a series to get labeled as such. I'd say that after seeing all the examples of this we could possibly come to the conclusion that "moe" is now a blanket term for general over used cuteness in a series or character(s). As for your K-ON! comment, I take the stance that all the characters are equally as "moe" as the last. Therefor, by law of physics, Daryl Surat's head will explode upon watching it. |
||||||||||||||
|
PetrifiedJello
Posts: 3782 |
||||||||||||||
I like this. It fits, and it seems to cover everything else I've read. Thanks, Mushi-Man. You've helped establish that moe is now a term I can remove from my vocabulary and dismiss it whenever I see it. Because if a term has become so generic, then it's worthless to use as a category/theme. It's like calling soda "coke". So many little nuances it's just not worth picking on the semantics. |
||||||||||||||
|
DomFortress
Posts: 751 Location: Richmond BC, Canada |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Blood-
Bargain HunterPosts: 25603 |
||||||||||||||
You are trying to be more tactful with *my* help? Oh dude. You are, like, soooooooooooooooo screwed. |
||||||||||||||
|
HitokiriShadow
Posts: 6251 |
||||||||||||||
I pretty much came to this same conclusion several years ago. The definitional issue has been a problem since almost day 1. There may be a somewhat standard definition in Japan, or perhaps only used to be, but I don't think there was ever much of a consensus on what the word really meant in the English fandom. The little sister feeling, the inspiration of a protective feeling, just a warm fuzzy feeling inside, and others have been used to define moe since very early on in its English usage and I don't recall a single one of those definitions ever being particularly dominant. "Cute", in some form, seems to be the one element that is pretty much present across the board in "moe" shows and characters, so it seems the most appropriate definition. While I like many shows that tend to get classified as moe, I've never really identified with the term. None of the definitions ever really meant anything to me as none of them really described why I was enjoying the shows and characters. Some of aspects of some of the definitions are very much opposed to what I like in characters, unless they are primarily intended as comic relief. |
||||||||||||||
|
4nBlue
|
||||||||||||||
A very good point. Vulnerability creates the feeling of wanting to protect/support what moe is supposed to be about. Of course it should be noted that a character with a weakness is not automatically moe . The way the vulnerability is presented is important. Ein and Drei (Phantom) give me the kind of moe-feeling (I want to do something to help them), but calling the characters moe because of it would be weird.
Girls seem to love guys with vulnerable side. Just look at how well Fruits Basket is selling. Though I'm not really sure about calling men moe is a good idea, even though it seems to be common with fujoshi in Japan. |
||||||||||||||
|
DarkGyraen
Posts: 34 |
||||||||||||||
|
I’ve never understood where all the bitterness and hatred towards moe comes from. As has been stated here, the general definition simply depicts a character that is vulnerable in some way, and creates a desire by the viewer to protect said character. There aren’t any requirements on the type of character this has to be in order to be moe under that definition.
I don’t agree that moe in general is a tactic directed directly towards men, or that it casts a negative light on women. Women are just as likely to want to defend/help someone in a bad situation that needs help as much as a man is. You could argue I guess that societal standards would place men with the desire to be a defender/protector, while women would want to play the role of helper/nurturer, but those ideals probably go farther back and have much deeper roots. There are many characters that would fall under the ideal of moe that perhaps people don’t think about. Anthy, from Revolutionary Girl Utena would be a good example of a character that’s solid, but still falls under the definition of moe. The entire show revolves somewhat around protecting and fighting for her, and the viewers are moved to the desire to see Anthy saved, helped and protected. You could also argue that every character that gets captured/kidnapped that the main characters have to save would fall under the definition of moe. In that case, the entire role of the character is to be saved, and thus they invoke the desire for people to see them protected. That’s why I don’t really understand the hate for moe. I understand that over the years, many negative characteristics and examples have been attached to the term, and they’ve changed the perception of what moe is. But by itself, moe is merely an idea to draw viewers into a show and have them grow attached to characters, which by itself doesn’t seem to be negative to me. |
||||||||||||||
|
dewlwieldthedarpachief
Posts: 751 Location: Canada |
||||||||||||||
|
Having any kind of meaningful discussion about moe is impossible unless some kind of definition is agreed upon and that tends to change depending on the individual. I would imagine there is some kind of authority on the topic that has an industry standard definition of moe because there is definitely programming that is created for an audience that wants it; however even if that is the case it won't stop the word from developing its own meaning much like other borrowed words have (e.g. karate used interchangeably with martial arts, otaku as a special word for anime fans, that sort of thing).
I think it's important to point out that moe content is not necessarily restricted to people who enjoy moe; maybe part of the reason shows not particularly engineered for a moe audience can be labeled such is due to that there is a degree of crossover between moe and drama. Clannad stands out in my mind as a good example of this; people can watch a show like that and be unfamiliar with or indifferent to moe and still enjoy it for its exploration of themes like family. Maybe a good way to define at least what a moe show is is to determine what purpose the show was made for. |
||||||||||||||
|
ikillchicken
Posts: 7272 Location: Vancouver |
||||||||||||||
I see what you're saying here and it sort of makes sense. I can certainly understand the appeal and perhaps even actually enjoy myself, this aspect of moe. However, what I'm having trouble understanding here is this: In my experience the bulk of moe characters seem to be little girls in a supposedly non-romantic situation. Yet your explanation only really seems to work in a romantic sense. Sure someone can still play that role of protector in a non-romantic relationship, but then so can they in real life. It's perfectly acceptable for a father or big brother to be protective of his daughter/little sister. Feminine empowerment doesn't really come into play there because it isn't really about gender and so that whole appeal you describe doesn't really apply. Do you think I'm mistaken in my assessment or do you have an alternate explanation for that other type of moe? |
||||||||||||||
| All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Bargain Hunter