| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
walw6pK4Alo
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:24 am |
 |
|
|
One of those "retractions to save face even though it's true and will be confirmed soon enough" ploys, right?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Nahinalau
Joined: 09 Nov 2011
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:31 am |
|
|
| walw6pK4Alo wrote: | | One of those "retractions to save face even though it's true and will be confirmed soon enough" ploys, right? |
Sure it's not one of those "retractions to save face because SHAFT's blown their budget and do not wish to reveal the movie's been delayed" ploys instead, right?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
walw6pK4Alo
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:32 am |
|
|
|
One or the other.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
CCharmanderK
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:22 pm |
|
|
|
I think it's another one of those foul-ups of accidentally revealing the release window before it's supposed to be announced. Happens all the time.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
dm
 Subscriber
Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 1714
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:07 pm |
|
|
| Nahinalau wrote: | | Sure it's not one of those "retractions to save face because SHAFT's blown their budget and do not wish to reveal the movie's been delayed" ploys instead, right? |
That would be exciting, considering the size of the budget they're likely to have had available to blow.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
