View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Richmyster84
Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Posts: 171
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:42 pm
|
|
|
Convenient censoring fanservice animes are pointless
|
Back to top |
|
|
CatSword
Joined: 01 Jul 2014
Posts: 1489
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:48 pm
|
|
|
2017: The year of impossible sequels and impossible licenses.
|
Back to top |
|
|
MischievousMelody
Joined: 17 May 2014
Posts: 474
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:31 pm
|
|
|
The only thing I can say to this is, "WHY?!"
Seriously, as someone who has seen all three OVAs (yes, even Sleeping), this license came as a very unpleasant surprise to me.
|
Back to top |
|
|
mangamuscle
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 2658
Location: Mexico
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:34 pm
|
|
|
So, the new catchphrase is "I bought this DVD to exercise (but please do not ask what part of my anatomy is going to get exhausted)"
|
Back to top |
|
|
Takkun4343
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 1499
Location: Englewood, Ohio
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:55 pm
|
|
|
MischievousMelody wrote: | The only thing I can say to this is, "WHY?!" |
Irony.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pokenatic
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 563
Location: Neo Venezia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:59 pm
|
|
|
Why? Like, seriously, why? From what I've heard of these OVAs, there's less value in these OVAs than the most mediocre fanservice slog. The bulk of each OVA is a repeating clip of whatever thing they're doing.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lord Oink
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 876
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:04 pm
|
|
|
Pokenatic wrote: | Why? Like, seriously, why? From what I've heard of these OVAs, there's less value in these OVAs than the most mediocre fanservice slog. The bulk of each OVA is a repeating clip of whatever thing they're doing. |
It is... but its strangely satisfying. Especially if you're into certain things. Shoulder straps falling off, cleavage, legs, cheek peeks. Also there is the natural/voyeristic angle.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kruszer
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 7983
Location: Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:08 pm
|
|
|
Why bother? I mean who would even pay money for this pedo bait? Sentai thinks someone will I guess.
|
Back to top |
|
|
dragonrider_cody
Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2541
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 6:57 pm
|
|
|
Kruszer wrote: | Why bother? I mean who would even pay money for this pedo bait? Sentai thinks someone will I guess. |
Maiden Japan, not Sentai. Matt Greenfield runs MJ. Sentai is run by John Ledford. Two separate companies. I would imagine, like most Maiden Japan titles, that this was probably bundled with something else.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dark Absol
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 813
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:15 pm
|
|
|
dragonrider_cody wrote: |
Kruszer wrote: | Why bother? I mean who would even pay money for this pedo bait? Sentai thinks someone will I guess. |
Maiden Japan, not Sentai. Matt Greenfield runs MJ. Sentai is run by John Ledford. Two separate companies. I would imagine, like most Maiden Japan titles, that this was probably bundled with something else. |
Maiden Japan and Sentai Filmworks are both under Section23 Films, so in a way, they're 'related'. I might be wrong though.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lord Geo
Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 2545
Location: North Brunswick, New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:33 pm
|
|
|
Dark Absol wrote: | Maiden Japan and Sentai Filmworks are both under Section23 Films, so in a way, they're 'related'. I might be wrong though. |
Sure, but only in the sense that releases from the two are solicited together & the like. John Ledford & Matt Greenfield are still two different people, so MJ is definitely the place where Greenfield is able to license what he wants, regardless of what Ledford thinks of them.
|
Back to top |
|
|
encrypted12345
Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 717
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:34 pm
|
|
|
Kruszer wrote: | Why bother? I mean who would even pay money for this pedo bait? Sentai thinks someone will I guess. |
There are more fitting insults than pedobait. Calling a big breasted woman pedobait is absurdist.
|
Back to top |
|
|
dragonrider_cody
Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2541
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:58 pm
|
|
|
Lord Geo wrote: |
Dark Absol wrote: | Maiden Japan and Sentai Filmworks are both under Section23 Films, so in a way, they're 'related'. I might be wrong though. |
Sure, but only in the sense that releases from the two are solicited together & the like. John Ledford & Matt Greenfield are still two different people, so MJ is definitely the place where Greenfield is able to license what he wants, regardless of what Ledford thinks of them. |
Yeah, they're both distributed by Section 23, but it doesn't own either label. They are certainly more closely tied than other video companies that share a distributor, but not to the point that they are the same management or really have any legal ties. It can be confusing though.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kruszer
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 7983
Location: Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:06 pm
|
|
|
encrypted12345 wrote: |
Kruszer wrote: | Why bother? I mean who would even pay money for this pedo bait? Sentai thinks someone will I guess. |
There are more fitting insults than pedobait. Calling a big breasted woman pedobait is absurdist. |
If that one doesn't work for you, feel free to substitute insipid tripe, inane garbage, or vapid rubbish, but personally I'd check her ID before I hit that if she was real.
Dark Absol wrote: |
Maiden Japan and Sentai Filmworks are both under Section23 Films, so in a way, they're 'related'. I might be wrong though. |
Yeah, my bad I meant to say Section23, which owns both so they're all part the same company if you ask me. I work for subsidiary company, myself, and when I fill out my W-2 every year it's not for the company I work for it's for the parent company and the parent company are the ones who deposit my checks.
|
Back to top |
|
|
relyat08
Joined: 20 Mar 2013
Posts: 4125
Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:34 pm
|
|
|
She's super cute. And I watched these because of that... But they are also garbage. And not even in the ironic "good" way that gets thrown around. I'm down for slice of life with a good bit of fanservice, but this isn't good slice of life, or good fanservice. The sleeping one was especially mind-numbing. I did fast forward through the majority of that one, at least.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|